Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis

被引:211
作者
Bajari, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
McMillan, Robert [3 ]
Tadelis, Steven [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Fed Trade Commiss, Washington, DC 20580 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONTRACTS;
D O I
10.1093/jleo/ewn002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Should the buyer of a customized good use competitive bidding or negotiation to select a contractor? To shed light on this question, we consider several possible determinants that may influence the choice of auctions versus negotiations. We then examine a comprehensive data set of private sector building contracts awarded in Northern California during the years 1995-2000. The analysis suggests a number of possible limitations to the use of auctions. Auctions may perform poorly when projects are complex, contractual design is incomplete, and there are few available bidders. Furthermore, auctions may stifle communication between buyers and sellers, preventing the buyer from utilizing the contractor's expertise when designing the project. Some implications of these results for procurement in the public sector are discussed (JEL D23, D82, H57, L14, L22, L74).
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 399
页数:28
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]  
MCAFEE RP, 1987, J ECON LIT, V25, P699
[22]  
SPULBER DF, 1990, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V6, P325
[23]  
Sweet J., 1994, Legal aspects of architecture, engineering and the construction process
[24]  
*US BUR CENS, 1992, CENS CONSTR IND US S
[25]  
*US BUR CENS, 1992, CENS CONSTR IND GEN
[26]  
Williamson OliverE., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capital
[27]   Indicative bidding and a theory of two-stage auctions [J].
Ye, Lixin .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2007, 58 (01) :181-207
[28]  
1998, ENG NEWS RECORD 1130, P35