Correlated inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the coincidence detector: Analytical solution

被引:6
作者
Mikula, S [1 ]
Niebur, E
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Krieger Mind Brain Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS | 2004年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
coincidence detector; inhibition; neural code; synchrony;
D O I
10.1109/TNN.2004.832708
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present a solution for the steady-state output rate of an ideal coincidence detector receiving an arbitrary number of excitatory and inhibitory input spike trains. All excitatory spike trains have identical binomial count distributions (which includes Poisson statistics as a special case) and arbitrary pairwise cross correlations between them. The same applies to the inhibitory inputs, and the rates and correlation functions of excitatory and inhibitory populations may be the same or different from each other. Thus, for each population independently, the correlation may range from complete independence to perfect correlation (identical processes). We find that inhibition, if made sufficiently strong, will result in an inverted U-shaped curve for the output rate of a coincidence detector as a function of input rates for the case of identical inhibitory and excitory input rates. This leads to the prediction that higher presynaptic (input) rates may lead to lower postsynaptic (output) rates where the output rate may rail faster than the inverse of the input rate, and shows some qualitative similarities to the case of purely excitatory inputs with synaptic depression. In general, we find that including inhibition invariably and significantly increases the behavioral repertoire of the coincidence detector over the case of pure excitatory input.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 962
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   A COMPARISON OF INHIBITION IN ORIENTATION AND SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CAT VISUAL-CORTEX [J].
RAMOA, AS ;
SHADLEN, M ;
SKOTTUN, BC ;
FREEMAN, RD .
NATURE, 1986, 321 (6067) :237-239
[22]  
Ricciardi L. M., 1977, DIFFUSION PROCESSES
[23]   Impact of correlated synaptic input on output firing rate and variability in simple neuronal models [J].
Salinas, E ;
Sejnowski, TJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (16) :6193-6209
[24]  
Shadlen Michael N., 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, V4, P569, DOI 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0
[25]   SUBMILLISECOND COINCIDENCE DETECTION IN ACTIVE DENDRITIC TREES [J].
SOFTKY, W .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 58 (01) :13-41
[26]   CORTICAL-CELLS SHOULD FIRE REGULARLY, BUT DO NOT [J].
SOFTKY, WR ;
KOCH, C .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1992, 4 (05) :643-646
[27]  
SOFTKY WR, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P334
[28]   Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex [J].
Steinmetz, PN ;
Roy, A ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Hsiao, SS ;
Johnson, KO ;
Niebur, E .
NATURE, 2000, 404 (6774) :187-190
[29]   Correlation between uncoupled conductance-based integrate-and-fire neurons due to common and synchronous presynaptic firing [J].
Stroeve, S ;
Gielen, S .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2001, 13 (09) :2005-2029
[30]  
Tuckwell H. C., 1989, STOCHASTIC PROCESSES