On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme

被引:77
作者
Martin, Ralf [1 ,3 ]
Muuls, Mirabelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Preux, Laure B. [1 ,3 ]
Wagner, Ulrich J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Imperial Coll Business Sch, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Grantham Inst Climate Change & Environm, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Ctr Econ Performance, London WC2A 2AE, England
[4] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Econ, E-28903 Getafe, Spain
关键词
Carbon leakage; Industrial relocation; Emissions trading; EU ETS; Permit allocation; Firm data; OUTPUT-BASED ALLOCATION; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; BORDER ADJUSTMENT; COMPETITIVENESS; INDUSTRY; ETS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme continues to exempt industries deemed at risk of carbon leakage from permit auctions. Carbon leakage risk is established based on the carbon intensity and trade exposure of each 4-digit industry. Using a novel measure of carbon leakage risk obtained in interviews with almost 400 managers at regulated firms in six countries, we show that carbon intensity is strongly correlated with leakage risk whereas overall trade exposure is not. In spite of this, most exemptions from auctioning are granted to industries with high trade exposure to developed and less developed countries. Our analysis suggests two ways of tightening the exemption criteria without increasing relocation risk among non-exempt industries. The first one is to exempt trade exposed industries only if they are also carbon intensive. The second one is to consider exposure to trade only with less developed countries. By modifying the carbon leakage criteria along these lines, European governments could raise additional revenue from permit auctions of up to (sic)3 billion per year, based on a permit price of (sic)30. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 88
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abrell Jan., 2011, Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data
[2]   Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Van Reenen, John .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (04) :1351-1408
[3]   New Approaches to Surveying Organizations [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Van Reenen, John .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (02) :105-109
[4]   Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies [J].
Branger, Frederic ;
Quirion, Philippe .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 99 :29-39
[5]  
Bureau van Dijk, 1999, ORBIS DATA BASE
[6]   Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market [J].
Bushnell, James B. ;
Chong, Howard ;
Mansur, Erin T. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2013, 5 (04) :78-106
[7]   Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme [J].
Chan, Hei Sing ;
Li, Shanjun ;
Zhang, Fan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :1056-1064
[8]   Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive [J].
Clo, Stefano .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) :2420-2430
[9]   Climate Policy & Corporate Behavior [J].
Commins, Nicola ;
Lyons, Sean ;
Schiffbauer, Marc ;
Tol, Richard S. J. .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (04) :51-68
[10]  
Dechezlepretre A., 2014, REV EC STAT IN PRESS