Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests

被引:399
作者
Hartley, W
Edwards, R
Lepp, NW
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Biol & Earth Sci, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Chem, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
关键词
arsenic; leaching; soil; extraction tests; iron oxides; adsorption;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2004.02.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several iron-bearing additives were evaluated for their effectiveness in the attenuation of arsenic (As) in various contaminated soils. These were selected for their known or potential ability to adsorb As anions, thus changing the speciation of As in a soil system. Three soils with different sources of As contamination were investigated (canal dredgings, coal fly ash deposits, and low-level alkali waste). The amendments used were goethite (alpha-FeOOH), iron grit, iron (II) and (III) sulphates (plus lime), and lime, applied to the soils at a rate of 1% w/w. A series of leachate extraction tests (UKEA, ASTM and modified Dutch column leaching test) were conducted on the equilibrated amended soils. These were used to firstly evaluate the potential of the amendments as immobilising agents, and secondly to compare the short- and long-term durability of their effects. Column tests demonstrated the efficiency of iron oxides over the longer time scale; these treatments significantly reduced concentrations of arsenic in leachates from all treated soils. Amended soils were also observed to contain higher levels of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in their leachates, signifying that certain Fe-oxides potentially increased heavy metal mobility in treated soils. The conclusions were that whilst Fe-oxides may be used as effective in situ amendments to attenuate As in soils, their effects on other trace elements, such as Pb and Cd, require careful consideration. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 504
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
*NETH STAND I, 1995, 7343 NEN
[22]   UPTAKE OF ARSENIC BY ASTER-TRIPOLIUM IN RELATION TO RHIZOSPHERE OXIDATION [J].
OTTE, ML ;
DEKKERS, MJ ;
ROZEMA, J ;
BROEKMAN, RA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1991, 69 (12) :2670-2677
[23]  
Parfitt R. L., 1980, Soils with variable charge., P167
[24]   PHOSPHATE-INDUCED RELEASE OF ARSENIC FROM SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD ARSENATE [J].
PERYEA, FJ .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (05) :1301-1306
[25]   MINOR ELEMENTS IN SOUTHEAST ITALY SOILS - A SURVEY [J].
POLEMIO, M ;
BUFO, SA ;
SENESI, N .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1982, 69 (01) :57-66
[26]  
REBEDEA I, 1997, THESIS LIVERPOOL J M
[27]   COMPARATIVE PHYTOTOXICITY AMONG 4 ARSENICAL HERBICIDES [J].
SACHS, RM ;
MICHAEL, JL .
WEED SCIENCE, 1971, 19 (05) :558-&
[28]   Arsenic in the soil environment: A review [J].
Smith, E ;
Naidu, R ;
Alston, AM .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 64, 1998, 64 :149-195
[29]   Adsorption and oxidation of arsenite on goethite [J].
Sun, XH ;
Doner, HE .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1998, 163 (04) :278-287
[30]  
VAGRONSVELD J, 1994, ENV CONTAMINATION CE, P142