Pesticide residue analysis and its relationship to hazard characterisation (ADI/ARfD) and intake estimations (NEDI/NESTI)

被引:75
作者
Renwick, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Clin Pharmacol Grp, Southampton SO16 7PX, Hants, England
关键词
maximum residue level; agricultural pesticide; acceptable daily intake; acute reference dose; pesticide intake;
D O I
10.1002/ps.544
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Over 800 pesticides are currently approved for use in one or more EU countries. The maximum residue levels (MRL) for agricultural pesticides are derived from field trials conducted under good agricultural practice (GAP). The MRL is a legally enforceable limit related to GAP. The results from field trials would only be used to establish MRLs if the estimated intake of residues did not exceed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) or acute reference dose (ARfD). However, the MRL is not linked to the ADI or ARfD, and could result in intakes considerably below the ADI/ARfD. This disconnection between hazard characterisation (ADI/ARfD) and potential exposure assessment (MRL) means that risk characterisation of pesticide residues is less transparent than for other chemicals present in human food. Residue levels at or below the MRL would not give intakes that exceed the ADI/ARfD but, despite this, there is public concern over such residues. Residue levels above the MRL have to be analysed on a case-by-case basis to determine if the intake could exceed the health-based limits. Other causes of public concern, such as the presence of multiple residues, are currently under investigation. (C) 2002 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1082
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Within and between field variability of residue data and sampling implications
    Ambrus, A
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2000, 17 (07): : 519 - 537
  • [2] RETRACTED: Synergistic activation of estrogen receptor with combinations of environmental chemicals (Retracted Article)
    Arnold, SF
    Klotz, DM
    Collins, BM
    Vonier, PM
    Guillette, LJ
    McLachlan, JA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5267) : 1489 - 1492
  • [3] Synergy between synthetic oestrogens?
    Ashby, J
    Lefevre, PA
    Odum, J
    Harris, CA
    Routledge, EJ
    Sumpter, JP
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 385 (6616) : 494 - 494
  • [4] Setting of acute reference doses for pesticides based on existing regulatory requirements and regulatory test guidelines
    Billington, R
    Carmichael, N
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2000, 17 (07): : 621 - 626
  • [5] UNCERTAINTY FACTORS AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION
    CALABRESE, EJ
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) : 190 - 196
  • [6] DOES THE ANIMAL-TO-HUMAN UNCERTAINTY FACTOR INCORPORATE INTERSPECIES DIFFERENCES IN SURFACE-AREA
    CALABRESE, EJ
    BECK, BD
    CHAPPELL, WR
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 15 (02) : 172 - 179
  • [7] Investigations into the causes of residue variability on carrots in the UK
    Carter, AD
    Fogg, P
    Beard, GR
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2000, 17 (07): : 503 - 509
  • [8] The use and limitations of current 'standard' toxicological data packages in the setting of acute reference doses
    Dewhurst, IC
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2000, 17 (07): : 611 - 615
  • [9] Dourson M L, 1983, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, V3, P224, DOI 10.1016/0273-2300(83)90030-2
  • [10] Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment
    Dourson, ML
    Felter, SP
    Robinson, D
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 24 (02) : 108 - 120