Computed tomography determination of prostate volume and maximum dimensions: a study of interobserver variability

被引:22
作者
Berthelet, E [1 ]
Liu, MCC [1 ]
Agranovich, A [1 ]
Patterson, K [1 ]
Currie, T [1 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Fraser Valley Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Surrey, BC V3V 1Z2, Canada
关键词
interobserver variability; prostate volume; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00026-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Objective: (1) To evaluate the reproducibility of prostate volume, maximum dimensions and geometrical center coordinates determination using computed tomography (CT) and (2) to identify patterns of interobserver variability. Materials and methods: Forty patients, suitable for our brachytherapy program, were selected for the study. All patients underwent CT scanning and the prostate volumes were determined by three radiation oncologists. Measurements of geometrical center coordinates, maximum organ dimensions in the anterior-posterior (AP), lateral (Lat) and longitudinal (Long) axes as well as prostate volumes were recorded. This yielded 840 measurements of seven variables for analysis. The means and corresponding standard deviations (SD) of each variable were calculated for each patient. The SDs were then averaged and presented as indices of dispersion. Average variations from the mean were also calculated for each observer along with the SDs. Results: Analysis of the geometrical center coordinates revealed acceptable variability amongst observers. For the AP, Lat and Long coordinates the SDs were 0.78, 0.89 and 1.72 mm, respectively. The corresponding values for the maximum organ dimensions were 2.54, 2.72 and 4.43 mm, respectively. While the volumes outlined by observer B were less than or equal to the mean in 95% of cases and those of observer C were greater than or equal to the mean in 93% of cases, the volumes of observer A were equally distributed above and below the mean (48% in both cases). Conclusion: The determination of the geometrical center coordinates was reproducible amongst observers. The largest variations were seen with the Long axis. The volume determination is more variable. However, a characteristic trend was seen amongst observers when their volumes were compared to the mean volumes of the group. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 40
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Interphysician variability in defining the planning target volume in the irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles [J].
Cazzaniga, LF ;
Marinoni, MA ;
Bossi, A ;
Bianchi, E ;
Cagna, E ;
Cosentino, D ;
Scandolaro, L ;
Valli, M ;
Frigerio, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :293-296
[2]
PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF RETROGRADE URETHROGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING [J].
COX, JA ;
ZAGORIA, RJ ;
RABEN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (05) :1119-1123
[3]
PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS [J].
CROOK, JM ;
RAYMOND, Y ;
SALHANI, D ;
YANG, H ;
ESCHE, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :35-42
[4]
Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy [J].
Dubois, DF ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Hotchkiss, LA ;
Prete, JJ ;
Bice, WS .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :785-789
[5]
Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning [J].
Fiorino, C ;
Reni, M ;
Bolognesi, A ;
Cattaneo, GM ;
Calandrino, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :285-292
[6]
Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions [J].
Ketting, CH ;
AustinSeymour, M ;
Kalet, I ;
Unger, J ;
Hummel, S ;
Jacky, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02) :445-453
[7]
Postimplant analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy: Evidence for a learning curve in the first year at a single institution [J].
Lee, WR ;
deGuzman, AF ;
Bare, RL ;
Marshall, MG ;
McCullough, DL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :83-88
[8]
To move or not to move: measurements of prostate motion by urethrography using MRI [J].
Mah, D ;
Freedman, G ;
Movsas, B ;
Hanlon, A ;
Mitra, R ;
Horwitz, E ;
Pinover, W ;
Iyer, R ;
Hanks, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (04) :947-951
[9]
Effects of urethrography on prostate position: Considerations for radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma [J].
Malone, S ;
Donker, R ;
Broader, M ;
Dahrouge, S ;
Szanto, J ;
Gerig, L ;
Bociek, G ;
Crook, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :89-93
[10]
Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants [J].
Narayana, V ;
Roberson, PL ;
Pu, AT ;
Sandler, H ;
Winfield, RH ;
McLaughlin, PW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (05) :1181-1185