Integrated technological-economic modeling platform for energy and climate policy analysis

被引:46
作者
Fortes, Patricia [1 ]
Pereira, Rui [2 ]
Pereira, Alfredo [2 ]
Seixas, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, CENSE, Dept Ciancias & Engn Ambiente, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, P-1200 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Coll William & Mary, Dept Econ, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
Bottom-up; Top-down; Hybrid modeling; Energy-climate policy; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; CGE MODEL; SCENARIOS; ABATEMENT; DETAIL; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.075
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
CGE (computable general equilibrium) and bottom-up models each have unique strengths and weakness in evaluating energy and climate policies. This paper describes the development of an integrated technological, economic modeling platform (HYBTEP), built through the soft-link between the bottom-up TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM system) and the CGE GEM-E3 models. HYBTEP combines cost minimizing energy technology choices with macroeconomic responses, which is essential for energy-climate policy assessment. HYBTEP advances on other hybrid tools by assuming 'full-form' models, integrating detailed and extensive technology data with disaggregated economic structure, and 'full-link', i.e., covering all economic sectors. Using Portugal as a case study, we examine three scenarios: (i) the current energy-climate policy, (ii) a CO2 tax, and (iii) renewable energy subsidy, with the objective of assessing the advantages of HYBTEP vis-a-vis bottom-up approach. Results show that the economic framework in HYBTEP partially offsets the increase or decrease in energy costs from the policy scenarios, while TIMES is very sensitive to energy services-price elasticities, setting a wide range of results. HYBTEP allows the computation of the economic impacts of policies in a technological detailed environment. The hybrid platform increases transparency of policy analysis by making explicit the mechanisms through which energy demand evolves, resulting in high confidence for decision-making. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 730
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Eurostat, 2014, EN STAT
[22]  
Eurostat, 2011, EUR SYST ACC ESA95 S
[23]   Top-down and bottom-up modelling to support low-carbon scenarios: climate policy implications [J].
Fortes, Patricia ;
Simoes, Sofia ;
Seixas, Julia ;
Van Regemorter, Denise ;
Ferreira, Francisco .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (03) :285-304
[24]   Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model [J].
Frei, CW ;
Haldi, PA ;
Sarlos, G .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (10) :1017-1031
[25]   Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling:: Analytic approaches and policy implications [J].
Grubb, M ;
Köhler, J ;
Anderson, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 27 :271-308
[26]   ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL MODELS FOR EVALUATION OF ENERGY-POLICY [J].
HOFFMAN, KC ;
JORGENSON, DW .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1977, 8 (02) :444-466
[27]  
Hourcade JC, 2006, ENERG J, P1
[28]  
IEA, 2011, END US PRIC EN PRIC
[29]  
INE, 2013, NAT ACC SER 1995 201
[30]  
Labriet M, 2010, COUPLED BOTTOM TOP D, P1