The nature of theory in information systems

被引:7
作者
Gregor, Shirley [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Informat Syst Res, ANU Endowed Chair Informat Syst, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Accounting & Business Informat Syst, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
theory; theory taxonomy; theory structure; information systems discipline; philosophy of science; philosophy of social sciences; interpretivist theory; design theory; design science; explanation; prediction; causality; generalization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this research essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in Information Systems. Despite the importance of theory, questions relating to its form and structure are neglected in comparison with questions relating to epistemology. The essay addresses issues of causality, explanation, prediction, and generalization that underlie an understanding of theory. A taxonomy is proposed that classifies information systems theories with respect to the manner in which four central goals are addressed: analysis, explanation, prediction, and prescription. Five interrelated types of theory are distinguished: (1) theory for analyzing, (2) theory for explaining, (3) theory for predicting, (4) theory for explaining and predicting, and (5) theory for design and action. Examples illustrate the nature of each theory type. The applicability of the taxonomy is demonstrated by classifying a sample of journal articles. The paper contributes by showing that multiple views of theory exist and by exposing the assumptions underlying different viewpoints. In addition, it is suggested that the type of theory under development can influence the choice of an epistemological approach. Support is given for the legitimacy and value of each theory type. The building of integrated bodies of theory that encompass all theory types is advocated.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 642
页数:32
相关论文
共 133 条
[91]   Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology [J].
Mingers, J .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) :240-259
[92]  
*MISQ, 2004, MISQ ROADM INF PROSP
[93]  
Mohr LB., 1982, Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities o f Theory and Research
[94]  
Moore G. E., 1965, ELECTRONICS, V38, P114, DOI [DOI 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860, 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860]
[95]   EXPLORING THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COMPONENT IN MIS RESEARCH [J].
MORRISON, J ;
GEORGE, JF .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1995, 38 (07) :80-91
[96]  
Nagel E., 1979, STRUCTURE SCI
[97]  
Neuman W., 2000, SOCIAL RES METHODS
[98]   Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning [J].
Ngwenyama, OK ;
Lee, AS .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1997, 21 (02) :145-167
[99]  
NORTON DF, 1999, CAMBRIDGE DICT PHILO, P398
[100]  
Nunamaker J. F. Jr., 1990, Journal of Management Information Systems, V7, P89