Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review

被引:491
作者
Henrie, Curtis R. [1 ]
Halverson, Lisa R. [1 ]
Graham, Charles R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Distance education and telelearning; Distributed learning environments; EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; ENGAGING STUDENTS; MATHEMATICS; ACHIEVEMENT; VALIDATION; CLASSROOM; SCIENCE; SUPPORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Using digital technology to deliver content, connect learners, and enable anytime, anywhere learning is increasing, but keeping students engaged in technology-mediated learning is challenging. Instructional practices that encourage greater engagement are essential if we are to effectively use digital instructional technologies. To determine the impact of innovative instructional practices on learning, we need useful measures of student engagement. These measures should be adaptable to the unique challenges to studying technology-mediated learning, such as when students learn at a distance or in a blended learning course. In this review, we examine existing approaches to measure engagement in technology-mediated learning. We identify strengths and limitations of existing measures and outline potential approaches to improve the measurement of student engagement. Our intent is to assist researchers, instructors, designers, and others in identifying effective methods to conceptualize and measure student engagement in technology-mediated learning. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 53
页数:18
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Aleven V., 2006, INT J ARTIF INTELL E, V16, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J TECHNOLOGY LEARNIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ONLINE J DISTANCE LE
[4]   Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Furlong, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (05) :369-386
[5]   Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Kim, Dongjin ;
Reschly, Amy L. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) :427-445
[6]  
Arroyo I, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3220, P782
[7]  
Astin AW, 1999, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V40, P518
[8]  
Aud S., 2012, The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). National Center for Education Statistics
[9]  
Baker R.S. J., 2012, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, P126
[10]   Teacher ratings of student engagement with educational software: An exploratory study [J].
Robert L. Bangert-Drowns ;
Curtis Pyke .
Educational Technology Research and Development, 2002, 50 (2) :23-37