Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g

被引:264
作者
Colom, R [1 ]
Rebollo, I
Palacios, A
Juan-Espinosa, M
Kyllonen, PC
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Psicol, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
关键词
working memory; g; crystallised intelligence; spatial ability; fluid intelligence; psychometric speed;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article analyzes if working memory (WM) is especially important to understand g. WM comprises the functions of focusing attention, conscious rehearsal, and transformation and mental manipulation of information, while g reflects the component variance that is common to all tests of ability. The centrality of WM in individual differences in information processing leads to some cognitive theorists to equate it with g. There are several studies relating WM with psychometric abilities like reasoning, fluid intelligence, spatial visualization, spatial relations, or perceptual speed, but there are very few studies relating WM with g, defined by several diverse tests. In three studies, we assessed crystallised intelligence (Gc), spatial ability (Gv), fluid intelligence (Gf), and psychometric speed (Gs) using various tests from the psychometric literature. Moreover, we assessed WM and processing speed (PS). WM tasks involve storage requirements, plus concurrent processing. PS tasks measure the speed by which the participants take a quick decision about the identity of some stimuli; 594 participants were tested. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded consistently high estimates of the loading of g over WM (96 on average). WM is the latent factor best predicted by g. It is proposed that this is so because the later has much in common with the main characteristic of the former. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 296
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ABAD FJ, IN PRESS PERSONALITY
[2]   Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities [J].
Ackerman, PL ;
Beier, ME ;
Boyle, MO .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (04) :567-589
[3]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRA
[4]   Quantifying cognitive complexity: evidence from a reasoning task [J].
Arend, I ;
Colom, R ;
Botella, J ;
Contreras, MJ ;
Rubio, VJ ;
Santacreu, J .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 35 (03) :659-669
[5]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[6]  
Baddeley A.D., 1999, Models of Working Memory, P28, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005
[7]   The complexities of complex span: Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults [J].
Bayliss, DM ;
Jarrold, C ;
Gunn, DM ;
Baddeley, AD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (01) :71-92
[8]  
BENNETT GK, 1974, DIFFERENTIAL APTITUD, P1995
[9]   Intelligence, schooling, and society [J].
Brody, N .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (10) :1046-1050
[10]  
Brody N., 1992, INTELLIGENCE