[18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse:: experience in 100 consecutive patients

被引:245
作者
Cimitan, Marino
Bortolus, Roberto
Morassut, Sandro
Canzonieri, Vincenzo
Garbeglio, Antonio
Baresic, Tanja
Borsatti, Eugenio
Drigo, Annalisa
Trovo, Mauro G.
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, CRO Aviano, IRCCS, Dept Nucl Med, I-33081 Aviano, PN, Italy
[2] Natl Canc Inst, CRO Aviano, Dept Radiotherapy, Aviano, PN, Italy
[3] Natl Canc Inst, CRO Aviano, Dept Radiol, Aviano, PN, Italy
[4] Natl Canc Inst, CRO Aviano, Dept Pathol, Aviano, PN, Italy
[5] Hosp S Maria degli Angeli, Dept Urol, Pordenone, PN, Italy
[6] Natl Canc Inst, CRO Aviano, Med Phys Unit, Aviano, PN, Italy
关键词
choline; PET; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-006-0150-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the potential of PET/CT and [F-18] fluoromethylcholine (FCH) in the assessment of suspected recurrence of prostate cancer after treatment. Methods: One hundred consecutive prostate cancer patients with a persistent increase in serum PSA (> 0.1 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy ( 58 cases), radiotherapy ( 21 cases) or hormonal therapy alone ( 21 cases) were investigated. After injection of 3.7 - 4.07 MBq/kg of FCH, both early ( at < 15 min) and delayed ( at > 60 min) PET/CT scans were performed in 43 patients, delayed PET/CT scans in 53 patients and early PET/CT scans in four patients. Results: Of the 100 patients, 54 ( PSA 0.22 - 511.79 ng/ml) showed positive FCH PET/CT scans. Thirty-seven patients had bone and/or abdominal lymph node uptake, while 17 showed pelvic activity. Malignant disease was confirmed in all but one. Delayed SUVmax of bone metastases was significantly higher (p< 0.0001 by paired t test) than that measured at < 15 min, whereas no differences were observed between early and delayed SUVs of malignant lymph nodes or pelvic disease. Forty-six patients ( PSA 0.12 - 14.3 ng/ml) showed negative FCH PET/CT scans. Of the negative PET/CT scans, 89% were obtained in patients with serum PSA < 4 ng/ml and 87% in patients with a Gleason score < 8. In none of these cases could recurrent tumour be proven clinically during a follow-up of 6 months. Conclusion: FCH PET/CT is not likely to have a significant impact on the care of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence until PSA increases to above 4 ng/ml. However, in selected patients, FCH PET/CT helps to exclude distant metastases when salvage local treatment is intended.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1398
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Contribution of the androgen receptor to prostate cancer predisposition and progression [J].
Buchanan, G ;
Irvine, RA ;
Coetzee, GA ;
Tilley, WD .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2001, 20 (3-4) :207-223
[2]   Limited role of radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with prostate specific antigen elevations after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cher, ML ;
Bianco, FJ ;
Lam, JS ;
Davis, LP ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Sakr, WA ;
Banerjee, M ;
Pontes, JE ;
Wood, DP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04) :1387-1391
[3]  
Coleman, 2000, Clin Positron Imaging, V3, P147, DOI 10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00059-5
[4]   11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer [J].
de Jong, IJ ;
Pruim, J ;
Elsinga, PH ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Mensink, HJA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (01) :32-38
[5]  
de Jong IJ, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P331
[6]   Visualization of prostate cancer with 11C-choline positron emission tomography [J].
de Jong, IJ ;
Pruim, J ;
Elsinga, PH ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Mensink, HJA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (01) :18-23
[7]  
DeGrado TR, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P110
[8]  
DeGrado TR, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P92
[9]  
DeGrado TR, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P1805
[10]   Pattern of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure dictates the probability of a positive bone scan in patients with an increasing PSA after radical prostatectorny [J].
Dotan, ZA ;
Bianco, FJ ;
Rabbani, F ;
Eastham, JA ;
Fearn, P ;
Scher, HI ;
Kelly, KW ;
Chen, HN ;
Schöder, H ;
Hricak, H ;
Scardino, PT ;
Kattan, MW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (09) :1962-1968