Renal Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

被引:230
作者
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
Thakur, Ravi K. [1 ]
Mannelli, Lorenzo [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Sooah [1 ]
Hecht, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Lee, Vivian S. [1 ]
Israel, Gary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; HEPATIC-LESIONS; BRAIN; DIFFERENTIATION; GADOLINIUM; PERFUSION; COEFFICIENT; KIDNEY; REGION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2512080880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of contrast material-enhanced (CE) MR imaging and to assess the performance of these examinations combined for the characterization of renal lesions, with MR follow-up and histopathologic analysis as the reference standards. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board waived the requirement of informed patient consent for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred nine renal lesions in 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; mean age, 60.7 years) were evaluated with CE MR imaging and breath-hold DW imaging performed with various b values. Renal lesions were characterized with use of CE MR criteria, and apparent diffusion coefficients(ADCs) were measured. The ADCs of benign and malignant lesions were compared at Mann-Whitney testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of DW imaging and CE MR imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Results: The 109 renal lesions-81 benign lesions and 28 RCCs had a mean diameter of 4.2 cm +/- 2.5 (standard deviation). The mean ADC for RCCs (1.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.61) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than that for benign lesions (2.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.87) at DW imaging performed with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). At a cutoff ADC of less than or equal to 1.92 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of DW imaging for the diagnosis of RCCs (excluding angiomyolipomas) were 0.856, 86%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CE MR imaging were 0.944, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Combined DW and CE MR imaging had 96% specificity. The AUC for the DW imaging-based diagnosis of solid RCC versus oncocytoma was 0.854. Papillary RCCs had lower ADCs than nonpapillary RCCs. Conclusion: DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC. (C) BSNA, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 407
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Prognostic impact of histologic Subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms - An experience of 405 cases [J].
Amin, MB ;
Amin, MB ;
Tamboli, P ;
Javidan, J ;
Stricker, H ;
Venturina, MD ;
Deshpande, A ;
Menon, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 26 (03) :281-291
[2]   Gadolinium deposition in nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy [J].
Boyd, Alan S. ;
Zic, John A. ;
Abraham, Jerrold L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 56 (01) :27-30
[3]   MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: Differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis [J].
Chan, JHM ;
Tsui, EYK ;
Luk, SH ;
Fung, SL ;
Cheung, JK ;
Chan, MSM ;
Yuen, MK ;
Mak, SF ;
Wong, KPC .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2001, 25 (02) :110-113
[4]   Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Cheville, JC ;
Lohse, CM ;
Zincke, H ;
Weaver, AL ;
Blute, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (05) :612-624
[5]   Single breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen [J].
Chow, LC ;
Bammer, R ;
Moseley, ME ;
Sommer, FG .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 18 (03) :377-382
[6]   Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results [J].
Cova, M ;
Squillaci, E ;
Stacul, F ;
Manenti, G ;
Gava, S ;
Simonetti, G ;
Pozzi-Mucelli, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (922) :851-857
[7]  
Fukuda Y, 2000, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V11, P156, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200002)11:2<156::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-8
[9]   Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis [J].
Fushimi, Yasutaka ;
Miki, Yukio ;
Okada, Tsutomu ;
Yamamoto, Akira ;
Mori, Nobuyuki ;
Hanakawa, Takashi ;
Urayama, Shin-ichi ;
Aso, Toshihiko ;
Fukuyama, Hidenao ;
Kikuta, Ken-ichiro ;
Togashi, Kaori .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (08) :743-748
[10]   Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging [J].
Gauvain, KM ;
McKinstry, RC ;
Mukherjee, P ;
Perry, A ;
Neil, JJ ;
Kaufman, BA ;
Hayashi, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :449-454