Automated segmentation of mouse brain images using extended MRF

被引:34
作者
Bae, Min Hyeok [1 ]
Pan, Rong [1 ]
Wu, Teresa [1 ]
Badea, Alexandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Ind Syst & Operat Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr In Vivo Microscopy, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Automated segmentation; Data mining; Magnetic resonance microscopy; Markov random field; Mouse brain; Support vector machine; NEUROANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; ATLAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We introduce an automated segmentation method, extended Markov random held (eMRF), to classify 21 neuroanatomical structures of mouse brain based on three dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance images (MRI). The image data are multispectral: T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, diffusion x, y and z weighted. Earlier research (Ali, A.A., Dale, A.M., Baclea, A., Johnson, G.A., 2005. Automated segmentation of neuroanatomical structures in multispectral MR microscopy of the mouse brain. NeuroImage 27 (2), 425435) Successfully explored the use of MRF for mouse brain segmentation. In this research, we study the use of information generated from support vector machine (SVM) to represent the probabilistic information. Since SVM in general has a stronger discriminative power than the Gaussian likelihood method and is able to handle nonlinear classification problems, integrating SVM into MRF improved the classification accuracy. The eMRF employs the posterior probability distribution obtained from SVM to generate a classification based on the MR intensity. Secondly, the eMRF introduces a new potential function based on location information. Third, to maximize the classification performance, the eMRF uses the contribution weights optimally determined for each of the three potential functions: observation, location and contextual functions, which are traditionally equally weighted. We use the voxel overlap percentage and volume difference percentage to evaluate the accuracy of eMRF segmentation and compare the algorithm with three other segmentation methods - mixed ratio sampling SVM (MRS-SVM), atlas-based segmentation and MRF. Validation using classification accuracy indices between automatically segmented and manually traced data shows that eMRF Outperforms other methods. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. Ail rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Automated segmentation of neuroanatomical structures in multispectral MR microscopy of the mouse brain [J].
Ali, AA ;
Dale, AM ;
Badea, A ;
Johnson, GA .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 27 (02) :425-435
[2]   Segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images through discriminant analysis [J].
Amato, U ;
Larobina, M ;
Antoniadis, A ;
Alfano, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2003, 131 (1-2) :65-74
[3]   Automated segmentation of multispectral brain MR images [J].
Andersen, AH ;
Zhang, ZM ;
Avison, MJ ;
Gash, DM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2002, 122 (01) :13-23
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ADV LARGE MARGIN CLA
[5]   Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning - A unified framework [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, K .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 6 (03) :209-217
[6]  
BAE MH, 2008, MIX RATIO SAMPLING C
[7]   Segmentation and measurement of brain structures in MRI including confidence bounds [J].
Ballester, MAG ;
Zisserman, A ;
Brady, M .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2000, 4 (03) :189-200
[8]  
BESAG J, 1986, J R STAT SOC B, V48, P259
[9]   In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and semiautomated image analysis extend the brain phenotype for cdf/cdf mice [J].
Bock, NA ;
Kovacevic, N ;
Lipina, TV ;
Roder, JC ;
Ackerman, SL ;
Henkelman, RM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (17) :4455-4459
[10]   Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images: An improved active shape model [J].
Duta, N ;
Sonka, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (06) :1049-1062