Risks and wrongs in social science research - An evaluator's guide to the IRB

被引：72

作者：

Oakes, JM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

来源：

EVALUATION REVIEW | 2002年 / 26卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/019384102236520

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

Having an Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and monitor the use of human subjects is now fundamental to ethical research. Yet social scientists appear increasingly frustrated with the process. This article aims to assist evaluators struggling to understand and work with IRBs. The author theorizes why IRBs frustrate and insists there is only one remedy: 4 ? must accept the legitimacy of IRB review and (a) learn more about IRB regulations, imperatives, and the new pressures on them: and (b) educate IRBs about social scientific methodologies and empirically demonstrable risks. A research agenda and tips tire offered.

引用

页码：443 / 479

页数：37

共 148 条

[31]

Delano SJ, 2002, I REV BOARD MANAGEME, P389

[32]

DELGADO R, 1986, UCLA LAW REV, V34, P67

[33] THE EXCHANGE AND ENFORCEMENT OF PROPERTY-RIGHTS [J].

DEMSETZ, H .

JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1964, 7 (01) :11-26

[34] The impact of a written parental consent policy on estimates from a school-based drug use survey [J].

Dent, CW ;

Sussman, SY ;

Stacy, AW .

EVALUATION REVIEW, 1997, 21 (06) :698-712

[35] What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation [J].

Dickert, N ;

Grady, C .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (03) :198-203

[36]

Diener E., 1978, Ethics in social and behavioral research

[37]

Dillman D.A., 2011, Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method

[38]

Donner A., 2010, Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research

[39]

DuBois James M, 2002, IRB, V24, P1, DOI 10.2307/3564025

[40]

ELLIOTT MM, 2002, I REV BOARD MANAGEME, P250

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →