Structure-based interpretation of missense mutations in Y-family DNA polymerases and their implications for polymerase function and lesion bypass

被引:68
作者
Boudsocq, F
Ling, H
Yang, W
Woodgate, R
机构
[1] NICHHD, Sect DNA Replicat Repair & Mutagenesis, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIDDKD, Mol Biol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
DNA replication; pol IV; pol V; pol eta; pol iota; pol kappa; Rev; 1;
D O I
10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00019-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of error-prone lesion bypass has changed dramatically in the past few years. The concept that the key participants in the mutagenic process were accessory proteins that somehow modified the ability of the cell's main replicase to facilitate bypass of normally blocking lesions has been replaced with one in which the replicase is displaced by a polymerase specialized in lesion bypass. The participants in this process remain the same, only their function has been reassigned. What was once known as the UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of mutagenesis proteins, is now known as the Y-family of DNA polymerases. Quite remarkably, within the space of 3 years, the field has advanced from the initial discovery of intrinsic polymerase function, to the determination of the tertiary structures of several Y-family DNA polymerases. A key to determining the biochemical properties of each DNA polymerase is through structure-function studies that result in the site-specific substitution of particular amino acids at critical sites within each DNA polymerase. However, we should not forget the power of genetic selection that allows us to identify residues within each polymerase that are generated by "random mutagenesis" and which are important for both a gain or loss of function in vivo. In this review, we discuss the structural ramifications of several missense mutations previously identified in various Y-family DNA polymerase and speculate on how each amino acid substitution might modify the enzymatic activity of the respective polymerase or possibly perturb protein-protein interactions necessary for efficient translesion replication in vivo. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 358
页数:16
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   MUTAGENIC DNA-REPAIR IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI .20. OVERPRODUCTION OF UMUD' PROTEIN RESULTS IN SUPPRESSION OF THE UMUC36 MUTATION IN EXCISION DEFECTIVE BACTERIA [J].
BATES, H ;
BRIDGES, BA ;
WOODGATE, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1991, 250 (1-2) :199-204
[2]   Proofreading of DNA polymerase η-dependent replication errors [J].
Bebenek, K ;
Matsuda, T ;
Masutani, C ;
Hanaoka, F ;
Kunkel, TA .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (04) :2317-2320
[3]   Quantitation of the inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination by the mutagenesis complex UmuD'C [J].
Boudsocq, F ;
Campbell, M ;
Devoret, R ;
Bailone, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 270 (02) :201-211
[4]   Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4):: an archaeal DinB-like DNA polymerase with lesion-bypass properties akin to eukaryotic polη [J].
Boudsocq, F ;
Iwai, S ;
Hanaoka, F ;
Woodgate, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (22) :4607-4616
[5]   COMPILATION, ALIGNMENT, AND PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS OF DNA-POLYMERASES [J].
BRAITHWAITE, DK ;
ITO, J .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1993, 21 (04) :787-802
[6]   THE 2-STEP MODEL OF BACTERIAL UV MUTAGENESIS [J].
BRIDGES, BA ;
WOODGATE, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1985, 150 (1-2) :133-139
[7]   Molecular analysis of mutations in DNA polymerase η in xeroderma pigmentosum-variant patients [J].
Broughton, BC ;
Cordonnier, A ;
Kleijer, WJ ;
Jaspers, NGJ ;
Fawcett, H ;
Raams, A ;
Garritsen, VH ;
Stary, A ;
Avril, MF ;
Boudsocq, F ;
Masutani, C ;
Hanaoka, F ;
Fuchs, RP ;
Sarasin, A ;
Lehmann, AR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (02) :815-820
[8]   Purification of a soluble UmuD'C complex from Escherichia coli - Cooperative binding of UmuD'C to single-stranded DNA [J].
Bruck, I ;
Woodgate, R ;
McEntee, K ;
Goodman, MF .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (18) :10767-10774
[9]  
Bruck I, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2
[10]  
Cann IKO, 1999, GENETICS, V152, P1249