A qualitative systematic review of the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in preventive analgesia

被引:230
作者
McCartney, CJL
Sinha, A
Katz, J
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Toronto Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[5] York Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
[6] York Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000108501.57073.38
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We evaluated in a qualitative systematic review the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists on reducing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption beyond the clinical duration of action of the target drug (preventive analgesia). Randomized trials examining the use of an NMDA antagonist in the perioperative period were sought by using a MEDLINE (1966-2003) and EMBASE (1985-2003) search. Reference sections of relevant articles were reviewed, and additional articles were obtained if they evaluated postoperative analgesia after the administration of NMDA antagonists. The primary outcome was a reduction in pain, analgesic consumption, or both in a time period beyond five half-lives of the drug under examination. Secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic request and adverse effects. Forty articles met the inclusion criteria (24 ketamine, 12 dextromethorphan, and 4 magnesium). The evidence in favor of preventive analgesia was strongest in the case of dextromethorphan and ketamine, with 67% and 58%, respectively, of studies demonstrating a reduction in pain, analgesic consumption, or both beyond the clinical duration of action of the drug concerned. None of the four studies examining magnesium demonstrated preventive analgesia.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1400
页数:16
相关论文
共 157 条
[51]   INTRATHECAL METHADONE AND MORPHINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA - A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY, DURATION, AND SIDE-EFFECTS [J].
JACOBSON, L ;
CHABAL, C ;
BRODY, MC ;
WARD, RJ ;
IRETON, RC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 70 (05) :742-746
[52]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12
[53]  
JAHANGIR SM, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P45
[54]   Perioperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine has no incremental beneficial effects on postoperative pain when standard-practice opioid infusions are used [J].
Jaksch, W ;
Lang, S ;
Reichhalter, R ;
Raab, G ;
Dann, K ;
Fitzal, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (04) :981-986
[55]   Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia [J].
Javery, KB ;
Ussery, TW ;
Steger, HG ;
Colclough, GW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (03) :212-215
[56]   LOW-DOSE KETAMINE INFUSION FOR ANALGESIA DURING POSTOPERATIVE VENTILATOR TREATMENT [J].
JOACHIMSSON, PO ;
HEDSTRAND, U ;
EKLUND, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 30 (08) :697-702
[57]   The effect of ketamine on 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine for caudal epidural blockade in children [J].
Johnston, P ;
Findlow, D ;
Aldridge, LM ;
Doyle, E .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 9 (01) :31-34
[58]   Effects of intrathecal ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia [J].
Kathirvel, S ;
Sadhasivam, S ;
Saxena, A ;
Kannan, TR ;
Ganjoo, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (09) :899-904
[59]   CRILE,GEORGE,WASHINGTON, ANOCI-ASSOCIATION, AND PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA [J].
KATZ, J .
PAIN, 1993, 53 (03) :243-245
[60]  
KATZ J, 1995, EUR J ANAESTH, V12, P8