Azithromycin vs cefuroxime plus erythromycin for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients - A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial

被引:91
作者
Vergis, EN
Indorf, A
File, TM
Phillips, J
Bates, J
Tan, J
Sarosi, GA
Grayston, JT
Summersgill, J
Yu, VL
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Infect Dis Sect 111EU, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Infect Dis Sect, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron, OH USA
[4] NE Ohio Univ, Coll Med, Rootstown, OH 44272 USA
[5] John L McClellan Mem Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, Little Rock, AR USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, San Jose, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Infect Dis Lab, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.9.1294
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin dihydrate monotherapy with those of a combination of cefuroxime axetil plus erythromycin as empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. The standard therapy of cefuroxime plus erythromycin was consistent with the American Thoracic Society, Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Consensus Group, and Infectious Disease Society of America consensus guidelines. The doses were intravenous azithromycin (500 mg once daily) followed by oral azithromycin (500 mg once daily), intravenous cefuroxime (750 mg every 8 hours), followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily), and erythromycin (500-1000 mg) intravenously or orally every 6 hours. Randomization was stratified by severity of illness and age. Patients who were immunosuppressed or residing in nursing homes were excluded. Results: Data from 145 patients (67 received azithromycin and 78 received cefuroxime plus erythromycin) were evaluable. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 19% (28/145) and 13% (19/145), respectively. The atypical pathogens accounted for 33% (48/145) of the etiologic diagnoses; Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were identified in 14% (20/ 145), 10%;, (15/145), and 9% (13/145), respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 91% (61/67) of the patients in the azithromycin group and 91% (71/78) in the cefuroxime plus erythromycin group. Adverse events (intravenous catheter site reactions, gastrointestinal tract disturbances) were significantly more common in patients who received cefuroxime plus erythromycin (49% [30/78]) than in patients who received azithromycin (12% [8/67]) (P<.001). Conclusions: Treatment with azithromycin was as effective as cefuroxime plus erythromycin in the empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients who were hospitalized. Azithromycin was well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1300
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   IN-VITRO ACTIVITY OF AZITHROMYCIN (CP-62,993) AGAINST CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS AND CHLAMYDIA-PNEUMONIAE [J].
AGACFIDAN, A ;
MONCADA, J ;
SCHACHTER, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (09) :1746-1748
[2]   IN-VITRO ACTIVITIES OF A STREPTOGRAMIN (RP59500), 3 MACROLIDES, AND AN AZALIDE AGAINST 4 RESPIRATORY-TRACT PATHOGENS [J].
BARRY, AL ;
FUCHS, PC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 39 (01) :238-240
[3]   Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: Guidelines for management [J].
Bartlett, JG ;
Breiman, RF ;
Mandell, LA ;
File, TM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (04) :811-838
[4]   ANTIBIOTIC-STUDIES IN PNEUMONIA - PITFALLS IN INTERPRETATION AND SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS [J].
CHOW, JW ;
YU, VL .
CHEST, 1989, 96 (03) :453-456
[5]  
DARK D, 1991, AM J MED S3A, V91, P31
[6]   NEW AND EMERGING ETIOLOGIES FOR COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THERAPY - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY OF 359 CASES [J].
FANG, GD ;
FINE, M ;
ORLOFF, J ;
ARISUMI, D ;
YU, VL ;
KAPOOR, W ;
GRAYSTON, JT ;
WANG, SP ;
KOHLER, R ;
MUDER, RR ;
YEE, YC ;
RIHS, JD ;
VICKERS, RM .
MEDICINE, 1990, 69 (05) :307-316
[7]   A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia [J].
File, TM ;
Segreti, J ;
Dunbar, L ;
Player, R ;
Kohler, R ;
Williams, RR ;
Kojak, C ;
Rubin, A .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (09) :1965-1972
[8]  
FINE MJ, 1990, AM J MED, V88, P1
[9]  
GLAUDE RP, 1989, ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, V33, P277
[10]  
GOMESLUS R, 1998, INT C ANT AG CHEM SE