Azithromycin vs cefuroxime plus erythromycin for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients - A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial

被引:91
作者
Vergis, EN
Indorf, A
File, TM
Phillips, J
Bates, J
Tan, J
Sarosi, GA
Grayston, JT
Summersgill, J
Yu, VL
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Infect Dis Sect 111EU, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Infect Dis Sect, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron, OH USA
[4] NE Ohio Univ, Coll Med, Rootstown, OH 44272 USA
[5] John L McClellan Mem Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, Little Rock, AR USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, San Jose, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Infect Dis Lab, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.9.1294
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin dihydrate monotherapy with those of a combination of cefuroxime axetil plus erythromycin as empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. The standard therapy of cefuroxime plus erythromycin was consistent with the American Thoracic Society, Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Consensus Group, and Infectious Disease Society of America consensus guidelines. The doses were intravenous azithromycin (500 mg once daily) followed by oral azithromycin (500 mg once daily), intravenous cefuroxime (750 mg every 8 hours), followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily), and erythromycin (500-1000 mg) intravenously or orally every 6 hours. Randomization was stratified by severity of illness and age. Patients who were immunosuppressed or residing in nursing homes were excluded. Results: Data from 145 patients (67 received azithromycin and 78 received cefuroxime plus erythromycin) were evaluable. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 19% (28/145) and 13% (19/145), respectively. The atypical pathogens accounted for 33% (48/145) of the etiologic diagnoses; Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were identified in 14% (20/ 145), 10%;, (15/145), and 9% (13/145), respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 91% (61/67) of the patients in the azithromycin group and 91% (71/78) in the cefuroxime plus erythromycin group. Adverse events (intravenous catheter site reactions, gastrointestinal tract disturbances) were significantly more common in patients who received cefuroxime plus erythromycin (49% [30/78]) than in patients who received azithromycin (12% [8/67]) (P<.001). Conclusions: Treatment with azithromycin was as effective as cefuroxime plus erythromycin in the empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients who were hospitalized. Azithromycin was well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1300
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   Prospective study of epidemiology and prognostic factors in community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Gomez, J ;
Banos, V ;
Gomez, JR ;
Soto, MC ;
Munoz, L ;
Nunez, ML ;
Canteras, M ;
Valdes, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 15 (07) :556-560
[12]   Aetiology and therapy of community-acquired pneumonia: A hospital study in northern Italy [J].
Guglielmo, L ;
Leone, R ;
Moretti, U ;
Conforti, A ;
Velo, GP ;
Vespignani, S ;
Zappala, G ;
Virone, C ;
Grillo, G ;
Barbiero, A ;
Borsato, L ;
Bonfanti, F ;
Bonato, D ;
Dona, G ;
Barbato, O ;
Falezza, GC ;
Delaini, C ;
Pedrazzoli, R ;
Vincenzi, P ;
Amadori, F ;
Tomasi, A ;
Bonifacio, S ;
Gabrielli, G ;
Quaglio, GL ;
Covi, MG ;
Stanzial, M ;
Vettore, L ;
Fazzini, PM ;
Galvanini, G ;
Sidoti, G ;
Zennaro, M ;
Marcon, L ;
Faresin, F ;
Beghelli, G ;
Nalin, G ;
Zavatteri, G ;
Conti, MP ;
Pasoli, C ;
Pedron, S ;
Girardello, R ;
Cisno, F ;
Zambotto, FM ;
Festi, G ;
Tommasini, A ;
DeConti, F ;
Cappellato, G ;
Calvo, MV ;
Barozzi, E ;
Meloni, GA ;
Tonin, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 51 (06) :437-443
[13]   5-DAY AZITHROMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA [J].
HOPKINS, S ;
WILLIAMS, D .
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1995, 56 (09) :915-925
[14]   Legionella species community-acquired pneumonia - A review of 56 hospitalized adult patients [J].
Lieberman, D ;
Porath, A ;
Schlaeffer, F ;
Lieberman, D ;
Boldur, I .
CHEST, 1996, 109 (05) :1243-1249
[15]  
MANDELL LA, 1990, CAN J INFECT DIS, V142, P369
[16]   Ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia: The frequency of atypical agents and clinical course [J].
Marrie, TJ ;
Peeling, RW ;
Fine, MJ ;
Singer, DE ;
Coley, CM ;
Kapoor, WN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 101 (05) :508-515
[17]  
MCCARTHY E, 1982, VITAL HLTH STAT 13, V69, P1
[18]   INFECTIONS CAUSED BY ERYTHROMYCIN-RESISTANT STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE - INCIDENCE, RISK-FACTORS, AND RESPONSE TO THERAPY IN A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
MORENO, S ;
GARCIALEONI, ME ;
CERCENADO, E ;
DIAZ, MD ;
DEQUIROS, JCLB ;
BOUZA, E .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 20 (05) :1195-1200
[19]  
MYER AP, 1993, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V37, P2318
[20]   Community acquired pneumonia: Aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission [J].
Neill, AM ;
Martin, IR ;
Weir, R ;
Anderson, R ;
Chereshsky, A ;
Epton, MJ ;
Jackson, R ;
Schousboe, M ;
Frampton, C ;
Hutton, S ;
Chambers, ST ;
Town, GI .
THORAX, 1996, 51 (10) :1010-1016