Multilocus test for introgression between the cactophilic species Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae

被引:18
作者
Counterman, Brian A. [1 ]
Noor, Mohamed A. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Levine Sci Res Ctr, Dev Cell & Mol Biol Grp, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Drosophila mojavensis; Drosophila arizonae; introgression; chromosomal inversion; isolation model;
D O I
10.1086/508632
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Information obtained from laboratory studies regarding the efficacy of barriers to gene flow ( reproductive isolation) between species is often incomplete or misleading, so detailed genetic analyses are needed to determine whether hybridization and introgression occur in nature. Previous laboratory studies of the cactophilic species Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae suggest that reproductive isolation is incomplete and that gene flow may occur in sympatry. We sampled 18 nuclear and one mitochondrial loci from multiple populations of D. arizonae and D. mojavensis to test for the signature of recent or historic gene flow between these two species. We located chromosomal regions that were inverted between these species and analyzed those regions independently of others. Statistical tests for introgression using all loci or only collinear loci failed to reject expectations of an isolation model. Further tests using average nucleotide differences between species and phylogenetic analyses also failed to find support for introgression between D. mojavensis and D. arizonae. Additional ecological and behavioral studies of these species in their natural habitats are required to explain why the signature of gene flow was not detected at the DNA sequence level in populations when laboratory studies suggest such gene flow should be possible.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 696
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation [J].
Rieseberg, LH .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (07) :351-358
[52]   Cytonuclear genomic dissociation in African elephant species [J].
Roca, AL ;
Georgiadis, N ;
O'Brien, SJ .
NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (01) :96-100
[53]   MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models [J].
Ronquist, F ;
Huelsenbeck, JP .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (12) :1572-1574
[54]   DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods [J].
Rozas, J ;
Sánchez-DelBarrio, JC ;
Messeguer, X ;
Rozas, R .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (18) :2496-2497
[55]   HOST-PLANT SPECIFICITY IN THE CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA-MULLERI SPECIES COMPLEX [J].
RUIZ, A ;
HEED, WB .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 57 (01) :237-249
[56]   EVOLUTION OF THE MOJAVENSIS CLUSTER OF CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF 2 NEW SPECIES [J].
RUIZ, A ;
HEED, WB ;
WASSERMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1990, 81 (01) :30-42
[57]   Effects of purifying and adaptive selection on regional variation in human mtDNA [J].
Ruiz-Pesini, E ;
Mishmar, D ;
Brandon, M ;
Procaccio, V ;
Wallace, DC .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5655) :223-226
[58]   Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs [J].
Sasa, MM ;
Chippindale, PT ;
Johnson, NA .
EVOLUTION, 1998, 52 (06) :1811-1820
[59]   A microsatellite linkage map of Drosophila mojavensis -: art. no. 12 [J].
Staten, R ;
Schully, SD ;
Noor, MAF .
BMC GENETICS, 2004, 5 (1)
[60]  
Swofford D.L., 2003, PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony *and other methods