Nephrotoxicity of Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Compared with Nonionic Low-osmolar Contrast Media: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:211
作者
Heinrich, Marc C. [1 ]
Haeberle, Lothar [2 ]
Mueller, Volker [3 ]
Bautz, Werner [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Lib Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE; INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TUBULAR CELLS; PHASE-III; FEMORAL ARTERIOGRAPHY; RADIOCONTRAST AGENTS; CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2501080833
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol with that of nonionic low-osmolar contrast media (CM) (LOCM) in randomized clinical trials. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted with a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science, ISI Web of Knowledge, Current Contents Medizin, Cochrane Library (until August 2007), trial registers, conference proceedings, and reference lists to identify studies and with requests from all manufacturers of CM for unidentified studies. Randomized controlled trials assessing serum creatinine levels before and after intravascular application of iodixanol or LOCM were included. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN) and change in serum creatinine levels. Results: Twenty-five trials were included. Iodixanol did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61, 1.04; weighted mean difference in serum creatinine increase, 0.01 mg/dL [0.88 mu mol/L]; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03). There was no significant risk reduction after intravenous administration of the CM (RR, 1.08; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.89); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.02) or after intraarterial administration (RR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.01); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.33, 1.07). However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, the risk of CIN was greater for iohexol than for iodixanol (RR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.68), whereas there was no difference between iodixanol and the other (noniohexol) LOCM (RR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.78). Conclusion: Iodixanol is not associated with a significantly reduced risk of CIN compared with the LOCM pooled together. However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, iodixanol is associated with a reduced risk of CIN compared with iohexol, whereas no significant difference between iodixanol and other LOCM could be found. (C) RSNA, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 86
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[11]   Nephrotoxicity of low-osmolality versus iso-osmolality contrast agents: Impact of N-acetylcysteine [J].
Briguori, C ;
Colombo, A ;
Airoldi, F ;
Morici, N ;
Sangiorgi, GM ;
Violante, A ;
Focaccio, A ;
Montorfano, M ;
Carlino, M ;
Condorelli, G ;
Ricciardelli, B .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 68 (05) :2250-2255
[12]   Effects of a dimeric vs a monomeric nonionic contrast medium on renal function in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial [J].
Carraro, M ;
Malalan, F ;
Antonione, R ;
Stacul, F ;
Cova, M ;
Petz, S ;
Assante, M ;
Grynne, B ;
Haider, T ;
Dalla Palma, L ;
Faccini, L .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (01) :144-147
[13]   Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment [J].
Chalmers, N ;
Jackson, RW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (859) :701-703
[14]   Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables [J].
Dangas, G ;
Iakovou, I ;
Nikolsky, E ;
Aymong, ED ;
Mintz, GS ;
Kipshidze, NN ;
Lansky, AJ ;
Moussa, I ;
Stone, GW ;
Moses, JW ;
Leon, MB ;
Mehran, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (01) :13-19
[15]   Randomized trial of contrast media utilization in high-risk PTCA - The COURT trial [J].
Davidson, CJ ;
Laskey, WK ;
Hermiller, JB ;
Harrison, JK ;
Matthai, W ;
Vlietstra, RE ;
Brinker, JA ;
Kereiakes, DJ ;
Muhlestein, JB ;
Lansky, A ;
Popma, JJ ;
Buchbinder, M .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (18) :2172-2177
[16]  
Deeks J. J., 2008, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, P243, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119536604.CH9, DOI 10.1002/9781119536604.CH10, DOI 10.1002/9781119536604]
[17]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[18]   Renal effects of cardiac angiography with different low-osmolar contrast media [J].
Donadio, C ;
Lucchesi, A ;
Ardini, M ;
Tramonti, G ;
Chella, P ;
Magagnini, E ;
Bianchi, C .
RENAL FAILURE, 2001, 23 (3-4) :385-396
[19]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[20]  
Feldkamp T, 2006, CLIN NEPHROL, V66, P322