Effects of subhypnotic doses of propofol on gastric emptying in volunteers

被引:16
作者
Chassard, D [1 ]
Lansiaux, S
Duflo, F
Mion, F
Bleyzac, N
Debon, R
Allaouchiche, B
机构
[1] Hop Hotel Dieu, Serv Anesthesie Reanimat, F-69002 Lyon, France
[2] Hop Debrousse, Lyon, France
[3] Hop Edouard Herriot, Gastroenterol Serv, Lyon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200207000-00014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Drugs which accelerate gastric emptying (GE) decrease nausea and vomiting. This could contribute to the antiemetic potential of subhypnotic doses of propofol. On the contrary, subhypnotic doses of propofol used for sedation could decrease GE and thus favor regurgitation and pulmonary inhalation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of low-dose propofol infusion on GE. Methods: On three separate occasions, 10 volunteers received either a propofol infusion at a rate set to achieve a target plasma concentration of 0.5 mug/ml or equivalent volumes of 10% Intralipid or 0.9% saline. GE for solids was measured by using the octanoic acid breath test. An acetaminophen absorption technique measured the GE rate for liquids. Blood samples were assayed for acetaminophen and propofol. Breath samples were analyzed for (CO2)-C-13 concentration by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Carbon dioxide production (V(overdot)co(2)) was measured instead of calculated by indirect calorimetry. Sedation was evaluated by the Bispectral Index of the electroencephalogram. Results: Propofol blood concentrations were 0.32 +/- 0.20 and 0.45 +/- 0.18 mug/ml at 60 and 165 min, respectively. These concentrations were not sedative. Propofol or its solvent did not modify GE for solids or liquids. in all groups, differences in GE were obtained if measured V(overdot)co(2) was integrated in the formula instead of calculated V(overdot)co(2) (P < 0.002). Conclusions: Subhypnotic doses of propofol known to be antiemetic do not inhibit GE. These results suggest that the antiemetic properties of propofol are not peripheral and that propofol cannot be considered as a prokinetic agent. V(overdot)(13)co(2) Must be measured instead of calculated to accurately determine GE.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] APPADU BL, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P1191
  • [2] EFFECTS OF D-BETA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE AND LONG-CHAIN AND MEDIUM-CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES ON LEUCINE METABOLISM IN HUMANS
    BEAUFRERE, B
    CHASSARD, D
    BROUSSOLLE, C
    RIOU, JP
    BEYLOT, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 262 (03): : E268 - E274
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT ON GASTRIC-EMPTYING OF EITHER ENFLURANE OR PROPOFOL GIVEN DURING MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA FOR MINOR SURGERY
    BENNETT, MWR
    BEMBRIDGE, JL
    SHAH, MV
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (08) : 675 - 677
  • [4] ADJUVANT PROPOFOL ENABLES BETTER CONTROL OF NAUSEA AND EMESIS SECONDARY TO CHEMOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER
    BORGEAT, A
    WILDERSMITH, O
    FORNI, M
    SUTER, PM
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (11): : 1117 - 1119
  • [5] SUBHYPNOTIC DOSES OF PROPOFOL RELIEVE PRURITUS ASSOCIATED WITH LIVER-DISEASE
    BORGEAT, A
    WILDERSMITH, OHG
    MENTHA, G
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (01) : 244 - 247
  • [6] BORGEAT A, 1993, ONCOLOGY, V50, P456
  • [7] Subhypnotic doses of propofol do not possess antidopaminergic properties
    Borgeat, A
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (01) : 196 - 198
  • [8] Cechetto DF, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P934
  • [9] [C-13]octanoic acid breath test for gastric emptying of solids: Accuracy, reproducibility, and comparison with scintigraphy
    Choi, MG
    Camilleri, M
    Burton, DD
    Zinsmeister, AR
    Forstrom, LA
    Nair, KS
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : 1155 - 1162
  • [10] CLEMENTS JA, 1978, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V24, P420