Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants

被引:258
作者
Tixier, J
Dusserre, G
Salvi, O
Gaston, D
机构
[1] Ecole Mines Ales, Lab Genie Environm Ind, F-30319 Ales, France
[2] INERIS, Direct Risques Accidentels, F-60550 Verneuil En Halatte, France
关键词
industrial hazards; risk assessment; explosions; fires; toxic gas dispersion; hierarchisation;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00008-6
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
For about 10 years, many methodologies have been developed to undertake a risk analysis on an industrial plant. In this paper, 62 methodologies have been identified, these are separated into three different phases (identification, evaluation and hierarchisation). In order to understand their running, it seems necessary to examine the input data, methods used, obtained output data and to rank them in several classes. First, all the input data are grouped together into seven classes (plan or diagram, process and reaction, products, probability and frequency, policy, environment, text, and historical knowledge). Then, the methods are ranked in six classes based on the combination of four usual criteria (qualitative, quantitative, deterministic and probabilistic). And finally, the output data are classified into four classes (management, list, probabilistic and Merarchisation). This classification permits the appraisal of risk analysis methodologies. With the intention of understanding the running of these methodologies, the connections between the three defined previously criteria (determinist, probabilistic and determinist and probabilistic) are brought to the fore. Then the paper deals with the application fields and the main limitations of these methodologies. So the hierarchisation phase is discussed and the type of scale used. This paper highlights the difficulties in taking into account all risks for an industrial plant and suggests that there is not only one general method to deal with the problems of industrial risks. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 303
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
PERHILLON P, 2000, PHOEBUS REV SURETE F, V12, P31
[32]  
Puertas I., 1998, P 9 INT S LOSS PREV, P283
[33]   Hazard identification based on plant functional modelling [J].
Rasmussen, B ;
Whetton, C .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1997, 55 (02) :77-84
[34]  
ROGERS RI, 2000, SMT4CT972169, P1
[35]  
Sankey P. D., 1998, P 9 INT S LOSS PREV, P441
[36]   Facility risk review as a means to addressing existing risks during the life cycle of a process unit, operation or facility [J].
Schlechter, WPG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 1996, 66 (1-3) :387-402
[37]   PLANT-LEVEL SAFETY ANALYSIS [J].
TOOLA, A .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1992, 5 (02) :119-124
[38]   The potential value of Saaty's eigenvector scaling method for short-term forecasting of currency exchange rates [J].
Troutt, MD ;
Elsaid, HH .
SIAM REVIEW, 1996, 38 (04) :650-654
[39]   SOME EXPERIENCES IN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK SHORTLISTING [J].
TWEEDDALE, HM ;
CAMERON, RF ;
SYLVESTER, SS .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1992, 5 (05) :279-288
[40]   Hazard analysis and support tool for computer controlled processes [J].
Yang, SH ;
Chung, PWH .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1998, 11 (05) :333-345