Detection of subtle lung nodules: Relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs

被引:208
作者
Samei, E [1 ]
Flynn, MJ [1 ]
Eyler, WR [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; lung neoplasms; diagnosis; lung; nodule; radiography; digital; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; thorax;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc19727
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the relative influence of quantum mottle and structured lung patterns (anatomic noise) on the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 8 x 8-cm lung pattern images were extracted from digital chest radiographs in healthy individuals. Sixty quantum mottle images of the same size and quantum noise level were extracted from uniformly exposed digital radiographs. Simulated nodules with various peak contrast-diameter products (CD) that emulated subtle tissue-equivalent lung nodules were numerically superimposed at the center on three-fourths of the images. Printouts were independently viewed and scored by five experienced radiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) was estimated as a measure of the detectability of the nodules. RESULTS: At a fixed observer performance level (eg, A(z) = 0.8), much smaller and lower-contrast nodules were detected on quantum mottle images (1-mm diameter, CD = 0.01 mm), compared with those on anatomic images (4.5-mm diameter, CD = 0.20 mm). The findings generally agreed with the signal-to-noise ratio calculations based on statistical observer models. CONCLUSION: The detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs is limited by anatomic noise.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 734
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, ERROR VARIATION DIAG
[2]   OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY - EFFECTS OF QUANTUM NOISE AND OBJECT VARIABILITY [J].
BARRETT, HH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1990, 7 (07) :1266-1278
[3]   RECOGNITION OF FORMS AGAINST A COMPLEX BACKGROUND [J].
BOYNTON, RM ;
BUSH, WR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1956, 46 (09) :758-764
[4]   EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
WAGNER, RF ;
JENNINGS, RJ ;
BARLOW, HB .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) :93-94
[5]   STATISTICALLY DEFINED BACKGROUND - PERFORMANCE OF A MODIFIED NONPREWHITENING OBSERVER MODEL [J].
BURGESS, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1994, 11 (04) :1237-1242
[6]  
BURGESS AE, 1982, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INST, V372, P99
[7]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL-DETECTION THEORY AND DETERMINATION OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS - RATING-METHOD DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :487-&
[8]  
Egan JP., 1975, SIGNAL DETECTION THE
[9]  
GAVELLI G, 1998, P INT C PREV EARL DI, P103
[10]   POSTMORTEM ROENTGENOGRAPHY WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS UPON THE LUNG [J].
GREENING, RR ;
PENDERGRASS, EP .
RADIOLOGY, 1954, 62 (05) :720-725