A comparison of the efficacy of pyridostigmine alone and the combination of pyridostigmine with anticholinergic drugs as pharmacological pretreatment of tabun-poisoned rats and mice

The ability of two types of pharmacological pretreatment (pyridostigmine alone or pyridostigmine in combination with two anticholinergic drugs) to increase the resistance of rats and mice against tabun and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of common antidotal treatment of tabun-poisoned rats and mice was compared. A significant decrease in the LD50 values of tabun was observed when mice as well as rats were pretreated with the prophylactic antidotal mixture consisting of pyridostigmine, benactyzine and trihexyphenidyle, designated PANPAL. Pyridostigmine-pretreated rats were also more resistant against acute lethal effects of tabun but pyridostigmine-induced resistance of rats was not so high as PANPAL-induced resistance. In addition, the pharmacological pretreatment with pyridostigmine alone was not able to protect mice against tabun-induced acute toxicity. The pharmacological pretreatment with pyridostigmine alone was able to increase the efficacy of currently used antidotal treatment (obidoxime in combination with atropine and diazepam) of tabun-induced poisoning, but PANPAL-induced increase in the efficacy of the same antidotal treatment was significantly higher than an increase induced by pyridostigmine alone. PANPAL-induced increase in the efficacy of antidotal treatment of tabun poisoning was also observed in mice. These findings confirm that PANPAL pretreatment of tabun-poisoned rats and mice seems to be much more suitable than currently used pyridostigmine alone. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.