Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality?

被引:102
作者
Judge, William Q. [1 ]
Fainshmidt, Stav [2 ]
Brown, J. Lee, III [3 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Coll Business, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Fayetteville State Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Fayetteville, AR USA
关键词
capitalism; comparative capitalism; fuzzy set methods; institutional theory; equitable wealth creation; macro-level analysis; PURCHASING POWER PARITY; INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEMENTARITY; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; BUSINESS SYSTEMS; INEQUALITY; VARIETIES; PERFORMANCE; CONTEXT; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1057/jibs.2014.13
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Capitalism is the dominant economic system adopted throughout the global economy, but there are many different models of capitalism practiced depending on what the society decides "economic effectiveness" is. In this study, we assert that an effective economy simultaneously achieves two seemingly divergent outcomes: it (1) creates economic wealth efficiently, and (2) shares that wealth equitably. Employing insights from Whitley's national business systems framework and fuzzy set analysis, we examine how national institutions collectively configure with respect to the overall level of equitable wealth creation within 48 developed and developing economies. We find that three configurations are associated with relatively high levels of equitable wealth creation, and another three are associated with relatively low levels. As such, our analysis supports the notion of equifinality - that there is no one optimal model of capitalism. Furthermore, we begin to demonstrate that these models of capitalism are constantly evolving, but their evolution is generally slow even when considering the practice of capitalism before and after the 2008 global economic crisis. We discuss the implications of these findings for the study of international business, with a special emphasis on considering a more holistic context for exploring how multinational enterprises interact with their institutional environment(s).
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 386
页数:24
相关论文
共 134 条
[41]   DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERIAL DISCRETION ACROSS COUNTRIES: HOW NATION-LEVEL INSTITUTIONS AFFECT THE DEGREE TO WHICH CEOS MATTER [J].
Crossland, Craig ;
Hambrick, Donald C. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (08) :797-819
[42]   Disclosure, venture capital and entrepreneurial spawning [J].
Cumming, Douglas ;
Knill, April .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2012, 43 (06) :563-590
[43]   Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study [J].
Dakhli, M ;
De Clercq, D .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 16 (02) :107-128
[44]  
Deeg Richard., 2007, SOCIO-ECON REV, V5, P149
[45]   Breaking the wave: The contested legitimation of an alien organizational form [J].
Delmestri, Giuseppe ;
Wezel, Filippo Carlo .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2011, 42 (06) :828-852
[46]   Wealth and Happiness Across the World: Material Prosperity Predicts Life Evaluation, Whereas Psychosocial Prosperity Predicts Positive Feeling [J].
Diener, Ed ;
Ng, Weiting ;
Harter, James ;
Arora, Raksha .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 99 (01) :52-61
[47]   National employment systems and job autonomy: Why job autonomy is high in the Nordic countries and low in the United States, Canada, and Australia [J].
Dobbin, F ;
Boychuk, T .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1999, 20 (02) :257-291
[48]   SO CLOSE YET SO FAR: INTEGRATING GLOBAL STRATEGY AND NONMARKET RESEARCH [J].
Doh, Jonathan P. ;
Lucea, Rafael .
GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2013, 3 (02) :171-194
[49]  
Dunning J., 2003, MAKING GLOBALIZATION
[50]   Development challenges of the "new Europe" [J].
Estes, RJ .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2004, 69 (02) :123-166