Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of the Offset Placement of an Implant-Supported Prosthesis on Bone Stress Distribution

被引:11
作者
Anitua, E. [1 ]
Orive, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Biotechnol Inst I MAS D, Vitoria 01005, Spain
关键词
biomechanics; dental implants; stress distribution; finite element analysis; offset; implant diameter; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; STRAIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.31213
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the straight alignment versus distal offset placement of an implant-supported prosthesis (using implants with different diameters: 4 mm, 4.5 mm, and 5 mm) on bone stress distribution. 3D finite element models of a straight configuration and different offset configurations of the implant-supported prosthesis (until 2.4 mm distal offset) were evaluated for the three implant diameters. A mesial load of 200 N and a distal load of 230 N were applied to the prosthesis. Results showed that implant offset provokes an opposite effect in bone stress depending on the exposed mesial or distal force. The former increases stress whereas the latter induces a dissipation of bone stress proportional to the offset. From these two forces, an optimal offset is created in which maximum bone stress is reduced in the range of 7-8% compared with the straight configuration. Increasing implant diameter from 4 to 5 mm decreased bone stress in 30% for all configurations. These data suggests that offset implant placement apart from enabling an optimal aesthetic restoration, reduces bone stress compared with the straight configuration. The use of wider implants permitted the reduction of the maximum bone stress in all the simulated configurations (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part 13: Appl Biomater 89B: 275-281, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P233
[2]
Akça K, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P722
[3]
ASH MM, 2003, WHEELERS DENT ANATOM, P194
[4]
Branemark PI., 1985, TISSUE INTEGRATED PR, P11
[5]
Çaglar A, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P36
[6]
Mechanical factors in bone growth and development [J].
Carter, DR ;
VanderMeulen, MCH ;
Beaupre, GS .
BONE, 1996, 18 (01) :S5-S10
[7]
Clelland N L, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P391
[8]
Davarpanah M, 2001, Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, V13, P761
[9]
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature [J].
Geng, JP ;
Tan, KBC ;
Liu, GR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (06) :585-598
[10]
Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation:: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements [J].
Heckmann, SM ;
Karl, M ;
Wichmann, MG ;
Winter, W ;
Graef, F ;
Taylor, TD .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (03) :345-350