Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China

被引:365
作者
Lin, H. [1 ]
Zeng, S. X. [1 ]
Ma, H. Y. [1 ]
Qi, G. Y. [2 ]
Tam, Vivian W. Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Sch Management, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
[2] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green innovation; Process innovation; Product innovation; Political capital; Stakeholders; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RESPONSIBLE CARE; CONNECTIONS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 72
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
[81]   An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective [J].
Ruf, BM ;
Muralidhar, K ;
Brown, RM ;
Janney, JJ ;
Paul, K .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2001, 32 (02) :143-156
[82]   A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability [J].
Russo, MV ;
Fouts, PA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (03) :534-559
[83]   Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review [J].
Schiederig, Tim ;
Tietze, Frank ;
Herstatt, Cornelius .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2012, 42 (02) :180-192
[84]   Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach [J].
Schuler, DA ;
Rehbein, K ;
Cramer, RD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (04) :659-672
[85]   Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy [J].
Sharma, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :681-697
[86]  
Shen Y., 2008, CSR COMPETITIVENESS
[87]   Does Giving Lead to Getting? Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises [J].
Su, Jun ;
He, Jia .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 93 (01) :73-90
[88]   Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty [J].
Tseng, Ming-Lang ;
Wang, Ray ;
Chiu, Anthony S. F. ;
Geng, Yong ;
Lin, Yuan Hsu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 40 :71-82
[89]   Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors [J].
van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (04) :559-574
[90]   Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe [J].
Wagner, Marcus .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (2-3) :392-402