Stimulus processing of glycine is dissociable from that of sucrose and glucose based on behaviorally measured taste signal detection in Sac 'taster' and 'non-taster' mice

被引:39
作者
Eylam, S
Spector, AC
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Ctr Smell & Taste, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
C57BL/6J; DBA/2J; 129P3/J; SWR/J; sweet taste; T1R receptors;
D O I
10.1093/chemse/bjh068
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mouse strains have been divided into 'tasters' and 'non-tasters' based on their relatively high and low preference, respectively, for low concentrations of sucrose and saccharin. These phenotypic differences appear to be due to a polymorphism in the gene at the Sac locus encoding for the T1R3 taste receptor selectively affecting the functionality of the T1R2+3 heterodimer. To psychophysically examine whether these phenotypes are due to sensory sensitivity as opposed to hedonic responsiveness, we measured taste signal detection of sucrose, glucose, and glycine by Sac taster (C57BL/6J and SWR/J) and non-taster (129P3/J and DBA/2J) strains in an operant conditioning paradigm using a gustometer. The taster mice had lower detection thresholds for sucrose and glucose compared with the non-taster mice. The detection thresholds corresponded well with reported responsiveness to low concentrations of these sugars in two-bottle intake tests suggesting that the Sac taster phenotype has a sensory basis and is not simply a matter of strain differences in the hedonic evaluation of weak intensities of the stimuli. Taster status did not entirely account for the strain differences in detection thresholds for glycine, a 'sweet' tasting amino acid. Collapsed across strains, detection thresholds for sucrose and glucose were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.81), but only modestly correlated with those for glycine (r less than or equal to 0.43). This suggests that stimulus processing of glycine in the perithreshold intensity domain can be dissociated from that of sucrose and glucose. The mechanism underlying this difference may be related to the ability of glycine to bind with the T1R1 +3 heterodimer.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 649
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac [J].
Max, M ;
Shanker, YG ;
Huang, LQ ;
Rong, M ;
Liu, Z ;
Campagne, F ;
Weinstein, H ;
Damak, S ;
Margolskee, RF .
NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 28 (01) :58-63
[32]   A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus [J].
Montmayeur, JP ;
Liberles, SD ;
Matsunami, H ;
Buck, LB .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 4 (05) :492-498
[33]   RELATIVE DISCRIMINABILITY OF SUGARS FOR RAT [J].
MORRISON, GR .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 68 (1P1) :45-+
[34]   An amino-acid taste receptor [J].
Nelson, G ;
Chandrashekar, J ;
Hoon, MA ;
Feng, LX ;
Zhao, G ;
Ryba, NJP ;
Zuker, CS .
NATURE, 2002, 416 (6877) :199-202
[35]   Mammalian sweet taste receptors [J].
Nelson, G ;
Hoon, MA ;
Chandrashekar, J ;
Zhang, YF ;
Ryba, NJP ;
Zuker, CS .
CELL, 2001, 106 (03) :381-390
[36]   GUSTATORY NEURAL RESPONSES IN 3 DIFFERENT STRAINS OF MICE [J].
NINOMIYA, Y ;
MIZUKOSHI, T ;
HIGASHI, T ;
KATSUKAWA, H ;
FUNAKOSHI, M .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1984, 302 (02) :305-314
[37]   SPECIFICITY OF ACQUIRED AVERSIONS TO TASTE QUALITIES IN HAMSTERS AND RATS [J].
NOWLIS, GH ;
FRANK, ME ;
PFAFFMANN, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 94 (05) :932-942
[38]   GENETIC INFLUENCES ON SACCHARIN PREFERENCE OF MICE [J].
PELZ, WE ;
WHITNEY, G ;
SMITH, JC .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1973, 10 (02) :263-265
[39]   AMINO-ACIDS AS TASTE STIMULI .1. NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL-ATTRIBUTES [J].
PRITCHARD, TC ;
SCOTT, TR .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1982, 253 (1-2) :81-92
[40]   Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains [J].
Reed, DR ;
Li, S ;
Li, X ;
Huang, L ;
Tordoff, MG ;
Starling-Roney, R ;
Taniguchi, K ;
West, DB ;
Ohmen, JD ;
Beauchamp, GK ;
Bachmanov, AA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (04) :938-946