Reducing false negatives in clinical practice: The role of neural network technology

被引:18
作者
Mango, LJ
机构
关键词
Papanicolaou's smear; cervical cytology; false-negative smear; neural networks; PAPNET;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70014-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The fact that some cervical smears result in false-negative findings is an unavoidable and unpredictable consequence of the conventional (manual microscopic) method of screening. Errors in the detection and interpretation of abnormality are cited as leading causes of false-negative cytology findings; these are random errors that are not known to correlate with any patient risk factor, which makes the false-negative findings a ''silent'' threat that is difficult to prevent. Described by many as a labor-intensive procedure, the microscopic evaluation of a cervical smear involves a detailed search among hundreds of thousands of cells on each smear for a possible few that may indicate abnormality. Investigations into causes of false-negative findings preceding the discovery of high-grade lesions found that many smears had very few diagnostic cells that were often very small in size. These small cells were initially overlooked or misinterpreted and repeatedly missed on rescreening. PAPNET testing is designed to supplement conventional screening by detecting abnormal cells that initially may have been missed by microscopic examination. This interactive system uses neural networks, a type of artificial intelligence well suited for pattern recognition, to automate the arduous search for abnormality. The instrument focuses the review of suspicious cells by a trained cytologist. clinical studies indicate that PAPNET testing is sensitive to abnormality typically missed by conventional screening and that its use as a supplemental test improves the accuracy of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1119
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
KRIEGER P, 1994, ACTA CYTOL, V38, P291
[12]  
KRISTENSEN GB, 1991, ACTA CYTOL, V35, P47
[13]   COMPUTER-ASSISTED CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING USING NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
MANGO, LJ .
CANCER LETTERS, 1994, 77 (2-3) :155-162
[14]  
MANGO LJ, 1994, TUTORIALS CYTOLOGY, P320
[15]   Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses [J].
Mitchell, H ;
Medley, G .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1995, 6 (06) :368-375
[16]   CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (DYSPLASIA AND CARCINOMA INSITU) AND EARLY INVASIVE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA [J].
NELSON, JH ;
AVERETTE, HE ;
RICHART, RM .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1989, 39 (03) :157-178
[17]   COMPUTER-ASSISTED PRIMARY SCREENING OF CERVICAL SMEARS USING THE PAPNET METHOD - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL SCREENING AND EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF THE CYTOLOGIST [J].
OUWERKERKNOORDAM, E ;
BOON, ME ;
BECK, S .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 5 (04) :211-218
[18]   BREAST FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION - A COMPARISON OF THIN-LAYER AND CONVENTIONAL PREPARATION [J].
PEREZREYES, N ;
MULFORD, DK ;
RUTKOWSKI, MA ;
LOGANYOUNG, W ;
DAWSON, AE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 102 (03) :349-353
[19]   INVASIVE SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX AFTER RECENT NEGATIVE CYTOLOGIC TEST-RESULTS - A DISTINCT SUBGROUP [J].
PETERS, RK ;
THOMAS, D ;
SKULTIN, G ;
HENDERSON, BE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (04) :926-935
[20]  
PLACE JF, 1994, CLIN CHIM ACTA, V231, pS5