The Influence of Enrollment Criteria on Recruitment and Outcome Distribution in Traumatic Brain Injury Studies: Results from the Impact Study

被引:20
作者
Roozenbeek, Bob [2 ,3 ]
Maas, Andrew I. R. [1 ,3 ]
Marmarou, Anthony [4 ]
Butcher, Isabella [5 ]
Lingsma, Hester F. [2 ]
Lu, Juan [4 ]
McHugh, Gillian S. [5 ]
Murray, Gordon D. [5 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosurg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Div Community Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
enrollment criteria; heterogeneity; outcome distribution; randomized controlled trial; recruitment; traumatic brain injury; HEAD-INJURY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTS; DESIGN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1089/neu.2008.0569
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Substantial heterogeneity exists among patients who suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Strict enrollment criteria may diminish heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but will also decrease recruitment and may affect the outcome distribution. The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of commonly used enrollment criteria for RCTs in TBI on potential recruitment and on outcome distribution. We used individual patient data from the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) database, including six therapeutic phase III RCTs (n-5816) and three surveys (n-2217) in TBI. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months after injury, which we dichotomized as favorable/unfavorable. We investigated the influences of commonly used enrollment criteria on recruitment and outcome distribution: time window between injury and admission to study hospital <= 8 h; age at injury <= 65 years; >= 1 reactive pupil; motor score > 1; Glasgow Coma Scale <= 8. Application of all enrollment criteria resulted in a large reduction of recruitment in both the surveys (up to 65%) and the RCTs (up to 41%). Among the remaining patients, fewer had an unfavorable outcome in both the surveys (original, 60%; remaining, 44%) and the RCTs (original, 43%; remaining, 38%). Applying these enrollment criteria to patients from the surveys resulted in an outcome distribution that approximated the outcome observed in the RCTs. The use of strict enrollment criteria leads to substantial reductions in the recruitment of RCTs in TBI. The outcome in TBI studies depends strongly on the enrollment criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1075
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BULLOCK MR, 2002, NEUROSURG FOCUS
[2]   Design and statistical issues in multicenter trials of severe head injury [J].
Choi, SC ;
Bullock, R .
NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 23 (2-3) :190-192
[3]  
Edwards P, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1957
[4]   Adjustment for strong predictors of outcome in traumatic brain injury trials:: 25% reduction in sample size requirements in the IMPACT study [J].
Hernandez, Adrian V. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Butcher, Isabella ;
Mushkudiani, Nino ;
Taylor, Gillian S. ;
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Marmarou, Anthony ;
Choi, Sung C. ;
Lu, Juan ;
Habbema, J. Dik F. ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2006, 23 (09) :1295-1303
[5]   Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not valid [J].
Hukkelhoven, CWPM ;
Rampen, AJJ ;
Maas, AIR ;
Farace, E ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Marmarou, A ;
Marshall, LF ;
Murray, GD ;
Steyerberg, EW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (02) :132-143
[6]   Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics [J].
Hukkelhoven, CWPM ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Farace, E ;
Marmarou, A ;
Murray, GD ;
Marshall, LF ;
Maas, AIR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2005, 22 (10) :1025-1039
[7]   Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury [J].
Kompanje, EJO ;
Maas, AIR ;
Hilhorst, MT ;
Slieker, FJA ;
Teasdale, GM .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2005, 147 (06) :633-640
[8]   Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations [J].
Maas, AIR ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Murray, GD ;
Bullock, R ;
Baethmann, A ;
Marshall, LF ;
Teasdale, GM .
NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 44 (06) :1286-1298
[9]   Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study [J].
Maas, Andrew I. R. ;
Marmarou, Anthony ;
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Teasdale, Sir Graham M. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 (02) :232-238
[10]   Evaluation of designs for clinical trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury [J].
Machado, SG ;
Murray, GD ;
Teasdale, GM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 1999, 16 (12) :1131-1138