Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram

被引:17
作者
Christov, Ivaylo
Dotsinsky, Ivan
Simova, Iana
Prokopova, Rada
Trendafilova, Elina
Naydenov, Stefan
机构
[1] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Ctr Biomed Engn, BU-1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
[2] Univ Hosp Aleksandrovska, Clin Cardiol, Sofia, Bulgaria
[3] Univ Hosp St Anna, Clin Internal Dis, Sofia, Bulgaria
[4] Natl Heart Hosp, Coronary Care Unit, Sofia, Bulgaria
[5] Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med Prof St Kirkovic, Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1475-925X-5-31
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The seventh annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge, 2006 addresses a question of high clinical interest: Can the QT interval be measured by fully automated methods with accuracy acceptable for clinical evaluations? Method: The PTB Diagnostic ECG Database was given to 4 cardiologists and 1 biomedical engineer for manual marking of QRS onsets and T-wave ends in 458 recordings. Each recording consisted of one selected beat in lead II, chosen visually to have minimum baseline shift, noise, and artifact. In cases where no T wave could be observed or its amplitude was very small, the referees were instructed to mark a 'group-T-wave end' taking into consideration leads with better manifested T wave. A modified Delphi approach was used, which included up to three rounds of measurements to obtain results closer to the median. Results: A total amount of 2*5*548 Q-onsets and T-wave ends were manually marked during round 1. To obtain closer to the median results, 8.58 % of Q-onsets and 3.21 % of the T-wave ends had to be reviewed during round 2, and 1.50 % Q-onsets and 1.17 % T-wave ends in round 3. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the values of the referees and the median after round 3 were 2.43 +/- 0.96 ms for the Q-onset, and 7.43 +/- 3.44 ms for the T-wave end. Conclusion: A fully accessible, on the Internet, dataset of manually measured Q-onsets and T-wave ends was created and presented in additional file: 1 ( Table 4) with this article. Thus, an available standard can be used for the development of automated methods for the detection of Q-onsets, T-wave ends and for QT interval measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   ERRORS IN THE VISUAL DETERMINATION OF CORRECTED QT (QTC) INTERVAL DURING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
AHNVE, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 5 (03) :699-702
[2]  
Bortolan G, 2004, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V16, P342
[3]  
BORTOLAN G, 1996, COMP CARD, V23, P665
[4]  
Bousseljot R, 1995, BIOMED TECH, V40, P317, DOI DOI 10.1515/BMTE.1995.40.S1.317
[5]   Interrater agreement in the measurement of QRS interval in tricyclic antidepressant overdose: Implications for monitoring and research [J].
Buckley, NA ;
OConnell, DL ;
Whyte, IM ;
Dawson, AH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 28 (05) :515-519
[6]  
Campbell R, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P878
[7]   EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF GROUP OPINION - DELPHI METHOD [J].
DALKEY, N .
FUTURES, 1969, 1 (05) :408-426
[8]   Automatic detection of the electrocardiogram T-wave end [J].
Daskalov, IK ;
Christov, II .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1999, 37 (03) :348-353
[9]   Electrocardiogram signal preprocessing for automatic detection of QRS boundaries [J].
Daskalov, IK ;
Christov, II .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1999, 21 (01) :37-44
[10]   Impact of electrocardiogram recording format on QT interval measurement and QT dispersion assessment [J].
Faber, TS ;
Kautzner, J ;
Zehender, M ;
Camm, AF ;
Malik, M .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (12) :1739-1747