The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: an Internet and catalog comparison

被引:293
作者
Mathwick, C [1 ]
Malhotra, NK
Rigdon, E
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Dupree Sch Management, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
cognitive continuum theory; Internet shopping; catalog shopping;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00066-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors introduce cognitive continuum theory (CCT) as a theoretical framework to examine the effect of consumer shopping tasks and retail information display properties on consumer perceptions of experiential value. In this empirical investigation, the nature of a consumer's shopping task is found to exert a direct influence on consumer perceptions of efficiency, economic value, and shopping enjoyment, all active dimensions of value. In addition, congruent interactions between shopping task and retail information display properties exert an enhancing effect on the reactive dimensions of value, as evidenced by perceptions of visual appeal, entertainment value, and service excellence. Future application of CCT is outlined and managerial implications are discussed. (C) 2002 by New York University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]  
HOLBROOK MB, 1994, ADV CONSUM RES, V21, P566
[32]  
Huizinga Johan., 1955, Homo ludens
[33]  
a study of the play-element in culture, Vfirst
[34]  
KOTLER P, 1974, J RETAILING, V49, P48
[35]  
Malhotra N.K., 1999, MARKETING RES APPL O, VThird
[36]   Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment [J].
Mathwick, C ;
Malhotra, N ;
Rigdon, E .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2001, 77 (01) :39-56
[37]  
OLIVER RL, 1999, CONSUMER VALUE FRAME, P126
[38]  
PARASURAMAN A, 1988, J RETAILING, V64, P12
[39]  
Payne JW, 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA
[40]   A MODEL OF CONSUMER INFORMATION - SEARCH BEHAVIOR FOR NEW AUTOMOBILES [J].
PUNJ, GN ;
STAELIN, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 9 (04) :366-380