Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years - Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness

被引:127
作者
Kerlikowske, K
Salzmann, P
Phillips, KA
Cauley, JA
Cummings, SR
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, Gen Internal Med Sect, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 282卷 / 22期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.282.22.2156
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Mammography is recommended and is cost-effective for women aged 50 to 69 years, but the value of continuing screening mammography after age 69 years is not known. In particular, older women with low bone mineral density (BMD) have a lower risk of breast cancer and may benefit less from continued screening. Objective To compare life expectancy and cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in elderly women based on 3 screening strategies. Design Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model. Patients General population of women aged 65 years or older. Interventions The analysis compared 3 strategies: (1) Undergoing biennial mammography from age 65 to 69 years; (2) undergoing biennial mammography from age 65 to 69 years, measurement of distal radial BMD at age 65 years, discontinuing screening at age 69 years in women in the lowest BMD quartile for age, and continuing biennial mammography to age 79 years in those in the top 3 quartiles of distal radius BMD; and (3) undergoing biennial mammography from age 65 to 79 years. Main Outcome Measures Deaths due to breast cancer averted, life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results Compared with discontinuing mammography screening at age 69 years, measuring BMD at age 65 years in 10 000 women and continuing mammography to age 79 years only in women with BMD in the top 3 quartiles would prevent 9.4 deaths and add, on average, 2.1 days to life expectancy at an incremental cost of $66 773 per year of life saved. Continuing mammography to age 79 years in all 10 000 elderly women would prevent 1.4 additional breast cancer deaths and add only 7.2 hours to life expectancy at an incremental cost of $117 689 per year of life saved compared with only continuing mammography to age 79 years in women with BMD in the top 3 quartiles. Conclusions This analysis suggests that continuing mammography screening after age 69 years results in a small gain in life expectancy and is moderately cost-effective in those with high BMD and more costly in those with low BMD, Women's preferences for a small gain in life expectancy and the potential harms of screening mammography should play an important role when elderly women are deciding about screening.
引用
收藏
页码:2156 / 2163
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[41]  
*TREEAG SOFTW, 1999, DATA VERS 3 5
[42]  
*US BUR CENS, 1991, VIT STAT, P84
[43]   Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine [J].
Weinstein, MC ;
Siegel, JE ;
Gold, MR ;
Kamlet, MS ;
Russell, LB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (15) :1253-1258
[44]   Diagnostic testing following screening mammography in the elderly [J].
Welch, HG ;
Fisher, ES .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (18) :1389-1392
[45]   EVALUATION OF THE INCREASE IN BREAST-CANCER INCIDENCE IN RELATION TO MAMMOGRAPHY USE [J].
WHITE, E ;
LEE, CY ;
KRISTAL, AR .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (19) :1546-1552
[46]   Gains in life expectancy from medical interventions - Standardizing data on outcomes [J].
Wright, JC ;
Weinstein, MC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (06) :380-386
[47]   Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women [J].
Zhang, YQ ;
Kiel, DP ;
Kreger, BE ;
Cupples, LA ;
Ellison, RC ;
Dorgan, JF ;
Schatzkin, A ;
Levy, D ;
Felson, DT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (09) :611-617