Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action

被引:737
作者
Brewer, Noel T. [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Gretchen B. [3 ]
Rothman, Alexander J. [4 ]
Leask, Julie [5 ,6 ]
Kempe, Allison [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, 325 Rosenau Hall,CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Adult & Child Consortium Hlth Outcomes Res & Deli, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Dept Pediat, Anschutz Med Campus, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[9] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Dept Pediat, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
vaccination; risk perception; affect; social processes; default; intervention; public health; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENTIVE HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEPATITIS-B VACCINATION; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; SCHOOL IMMUNIZATION REQUIREMENTS; SEASONAL INFLUENZA VACCINATION; FUZZY-TRACE THEORY; HPV VACCINATION; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1177/1529100618760521
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Vaccination is one of the great achievements of the 20th century, yet persistent public-health problems include inadequate, delayed, and unstable vaccination uptake. Psychology offers three general propositions for understanding and intervening to increase uptake where vaccines are available and affordable. The first proposition is that thoughts and feelings can motivate getting vaccinated. Hundreds of studies have shown that risk beliefs and anticipated regret about infectious disease correlate reliably with getting vaccinated; low confidence in vaccine effectiveness and concern about safety correlate reliably with not getting vaccinated. We were surprised to find that few randomized trials have successfully changed what people think and feel about vaccines, and those few that succeeded were minimally effective in increasing uptake. The second proposition is that social processes can motivate getting vaccinated. Substantial research has shown that social norms are associated with vaccination, but few interventions examined whether normative messages increase vaccination uptake. Many experimental studies have relied on hypothetical scenarios to demonstrate that altruism and free riding (i.e., taking advantage of the protection provided by others) can affect intended behavior, but few randomized trials have tested strategies to change social processes to increase vaccination uptake. The third proposition is that interventions can facilitate vaccination directly by leveraging, but not trying to change, what people think and feel. These interventions are by far the most plentiful and effective in the literature. To increase vaccine uptake, these interventions build on existing favorable intentions by facilitating action (through reminders, prompts, and primes) and reducing barriers (through logistics and healthy defaults); these interventions also shape behavior (through incentives, sanctions, and requirements). Although identification of principles for changing thoughts and feelings to motivate vaccination is a work in progress, psychological principles can now inform the design of systems and policies to directly facilitate action.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 207
页数:59
相关论文
共 427 条
[91]   Social Media and the Science of Health Behavior [J].
Centola, Damon .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (21) :2135-2144
[92]   An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior [J].
Centola, Damon .
SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) :1269-1272
[93]   The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment [J].
Centola, Damon .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5996) :1194-1197
[94]   Impact of the Ottawa Influenza Decision Aid on healthcare personnel's influenza immunization decision: a randomized trial [J].
Chambers, L. W. ;
Wilson, K. ;
Hawken, S. ;
Puxty, J. ;
Crowe, L. ;
Lam, P. -P. ;
Farmanova-Haynes, E. ;
McNeil, S. A. ;
McCarthy, A. E. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2012, 82 (03) :194-202
[95]   Emotions and preventive health behavior: Worry, regret, and influenza vaccination [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Coups, EJ .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 25 (01) :82-90
[96]   Time preferences and preventive health behavior: Acceptance of the influenza vaccine [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Coups, EJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (03) :307-314
[97]   Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Coups, EJ .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (04) :249-262
[98]  
Chapman Gretchen B, 2016, Behav Sci Policy, V2, P40, DOI 10.1353/bsp.2016.0014
[99]   Using Game Theory to Examine Incentives in Influenza Vaccination Behavior [J].
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Li, Meng ;
Vietri, Jeffrey ;
Ibuka, Yoko ;
Thomas, David ;
Yoon, Haewon ;
Galvani, Alison P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (09) :1008-1015
[100]   Opting In vs Opting Out of Influenza Vaccination [J].
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Li, Meng ;
Colby, Helen ;
Yoon, Haewon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (01) :43-44