Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases

被引:50
作者
Kelly, Michael P. [1 ]
Eliasberg, Claire D. [2 ]
Riley, Max S. [1 ]
Ajiboye, Remi M. [3 ]
SooHoo, Nelson F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, 660 South Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8233, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Orthoped Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Artificial disc; Cervical degenerative disc disease; Reoperations; Spinal fusion; Total disc arthroplasty; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; META-ANALYSIS; PRODISC-C; FOLLOW-UP; METAANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; DISEASE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-018-5570-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to analyze rates of perioperative complications and subsequent cervical surgeries in patients treated for cervical degenerative disc disease with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and those treated with artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) for up to 5-year follow-up. California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development discharge database was analyzed for patients aged 18-65 years undergoing single-level ACDF or ACDA between 2003 and 2010. Medical comorbidities were identified with CMS-Condition Categories. Readmissions for short-term complications of the procedure were identified and rates of subsequent cervical surgeries were calculated at 90-day and 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify associations with complications and subsequent cervical surgeries correcting for patient and provider characteristics. A total of 52,395 eligible cases were identified: 50,926 ACDF and 1469 ACDA. Readmission was less common in the ACDA group (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-1.0, p = 0.048). Subsequent cervical spine surgery was more common in the ACDF group in the immediate perioperative period (within 90 days of surgery) (ACDF 3.35% vs. ACDA 2.04%, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92, p = 0.015). At 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperatively, rates of subsequent cervical surgeries were similar between the two cohorts. We found no protective benefit for ACDA versus ACDF for single-level disease at up to 5-year follow-up in the largest cohort of patients examined to date. Early complications were rare in both cohorts stressing the value of large cohort studies to study risk factors for rare events. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1439
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Evaluation of Adverse Events in Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Nassr, Ahmad ;
Currier, Bradford L. ;
Sebastian, Arjun S. ;
Arnold, Paul M. ;
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Mroz, Thomas E. ;
Riew, K. Daniel .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 :765-835
[2]
Kinematics of the Cervical Adjacent Segments After Disc Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Discectomy and Fusion A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Hipp, John ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Raich, Annie ;
Hashimoto, Robin .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (22) :S85-S95
[3]
Trends in the Treatment of Single and Multilevel Cervical Stenosis A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database [J].
Arrojas, Alfredo ;
Jackson, J. Benjamin, III ;
Grabowski, Gregory .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (18) :e99
[4]
Five-Year Reoperation Rates, Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion, Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Delamarter, Rick B. ;
Zigler, Jack .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (09) :711-717
[5]
Adjacent-Level Cervical Ossification After Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion [J].
Garrido, Ben J. ;
Wilhite, Jon ;
Nakano, Masato ;
Crawford, Charles ;
Baldus, Christine ;
Riew, K. Daniel ;
Sasso, Rick C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (13) :1185-1189
[6]
The Effect of Workers' Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study [J].
Gornet, Matthew F. ;
Schranck, Francine W. ;
Copay, Anne G. ;
Kopjar, Branko .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (02) :93-99
[7]
Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [J].
Hilibrand, AS ;
Carlson, GD ;
Palumbo, MA ;
Jones, PK ;
Bohlman, HH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :519-528
[8]
Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up [J].
Jackson, Robert J. ;
Davis, Reginald J. ;
Hoffman, Gregory A. ;
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Hisey, Michael S. ;
Kim, Kee D. ;
Gaede, Steven E. ;
Nunley, Pierce Dalton .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (05) :734-745
[9]
ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study [J].
Janssen, Michael E. ;
Zigler, Jack E. ;
Spivak, Jeffrey M. ;
Delamarter, Rick B. ;
Darden, Bruce V., II ;
Kopjar, Branko .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (21) :1738-1747
[10]
Comparing Nonrandomized Observational Studies With Randomized Controlled Trials in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Meta-analysis [J].
Jee, Young Min ;
Bak, John Seongweon ;
Weinlander, Eric ;
Anderson, Paul A. .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (05) :419-428