Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data

被引:160
作者
Ossa, Ralph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
SCALE ECONOMIES; TARIFFS; PROTECTION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1257/aer.104.12.4104
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How large are optimal tariffs? What tariffs would prevail in a worldwide trade war? How costly would a breakdown of international trade policy cooperation be? And what is the scope for future multilateral trade negotiations? I address these and other questions using a unified framework which nests traditional, new trade, and political economy motives for protection. I find that optimal tariffs average 62 percent, world trade war tariffs average 63 percent, the government welfare losses from a breakdown of international trade policy cooperation average 2.9 percent, and the possible government welfare gains from future multilateral trade negotiations average 0.5 percent.
引用
收藏
页码:4104 / 4146
页数:43
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]  
Caliendo Lorenzo, REV EC STUDIES
[12]  
Caplin A., 1988, SEOUL J ECON, V1, P267
[13]   Unbalanced trade [J].
Dekle, Robert ;
Eaton, Jonathan ;
Kortum, Samuel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (02) :351-355
[14]   Technology, geography, and trade [J].
Eaton, J ;
Kortum, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (05) :1741-1779
[15]  
Feenstra R.C., 2010, Product Variety and the Gains from International Trade
[16]  
FEENSTRA RC, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P157
[17]   INDUSTRIAL-POLICY UNDER MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION [J].
FLAM, H ;
HELPMAN, E .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 22 (1-2) :79-102
[18]   Protection for sale: An empirical investigation [J].
Goldberg, PK ;
Maggi, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (05) :1135-1155
[19]  
GROSSMAN GM, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P833
[20]  
Guimbard H., 2012, MAcMap-HS6 2007, an exhaustive and consistent measure of applied protection in 2007