The relationship between yield and assimilate supply in lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)

被引:25
作者
Hieke, S
Menzel, CM
Doogan, VJ
Lüdders, P
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Primary Ind, Maroochy Res Stn, Nambour, Qld 4560, Australia
[2] Queensland Dept Primary Ind, Moorooka, Qld 4105, Australia
[3] Humboldt Univ, Landwirtschaftlich Gartner Fak, Inst Gartenbauwissensch, Fachgebiet Obstbau, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY | 2002年 / 77卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14620316.2002.11511501
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Experiments were conducted on lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) in subtropical Australia (lat. 27degrees-29degreesS) to evaluate the role of assimilates on fruit retention. All the leaves of the last flush, all the leaves of the previous flush (about eight leaves per terminal shoot), or all the old leaves were removed from trees. Medium (3-5 cm diameter) or large branches (5-10 cm diameter) were girdled and defoliated after fruit set, and fruit retention compared with ungirdled and undefoliated branches. Other branches were girdled and defoliated between anthesis and fruit harvest. Finally, 20, 50 or 80% of the flowering panicles were defruited on large trees. Defoliated trees had 35 to 45% lower yields than the controls. This was despite the treatment with all the old leaves removed having a much lower leaf area index than the other defoliation treatments (1.7 vs. 2.3 and 2.8). Leaves next to the inflorescences are more important for yield than the older leaves. Fruit retention was very low on girdled branches that had been defoliated, especially when the leaves were removed in the first 20 d after anthesis. This suggests that the yields of girdled branches were determined by the availability of assimilates soon after fruit set. In contrast, the number of fruit retained on ungirdled branches was unrelated to the number of leaves, with defoliation having no effect on yield. Fruit on these branches were supported by resources from elsewhere in the tree. Thinned trees had similar yields to those of unthinned plots (65-82 kg tree(-1)). Thinning apparently increased fruit retention in the remaining clusters, under a higher leaf:fruit ratio. There were large differences in the concentrations of starch in the tree, and seasonal changes, with starch declining from flowering to fruit harvest. In contrast, there were only small responses to the treatments, suggesting that the fruit were mainly dependent on current photosynthesis. Photosynthesis in the leaves behind the fruit clusters was more important than photosynthesis in the older shaded leaves.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 332
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bustan A., 1996, Acta Horticulturae, P81
[2]   STUDIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAF NUMBER AND AREA AND FRUIT-DEVELOPMENT IN MANGO (MANGIFERA-INDICA L) [J].
CHACKO, EK ;
REDDY, YTN ;
ANANTHANARAYANAN, TV .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1982, 57 (04) :483-492
[3]  
FORSHEY CG, 1977, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V102, P399
[4]  
HIEKE S, 2002, IN PRESS TREE PHYSL, V22
[5]   DEFOLIATION INCREASES FRUIT ABSCISSION AND REDUCES CARBOHYDRATE-LEVELS IN DEVELOPING FRUITS AND WOODY TISSUES OF CITRUS-UNSHIU [J].
MEHOUACHI, J ;
SERNA, D ;
ZARAGOZA, S ;
AGUSTI, M ;
TALON, M ;
PRIMOMILLO, E .
PLANT SCIENCE, 1995, 107 (02) :189-197
[6]   CARBOHYDRATE RESERVES IN LYCHEE TREES (LITCHI-CHINENSIS SONN) [J].
MENZEL, CM ;
RASMUSSEN, TS ;
SIMPSON, DR .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1995, 70 (02) :245-255
[7]   Effects of defoliation and girdling on fruit production in Ilex aquifolium [J].
Obeso, JR .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) :486-491
[8]  
PAVEL EW, 1993, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V88, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb05507.x
[9]   THE ROLE OF SPUR AND BOURSE LEAVES OF 3 APPLE CULTIVARS ON FRUIT-SET AND GROWTH AND CALCIUM CONTENT [J].
PROCTOR, JTA ;
PALMER, JW .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1991, 66 (03) :275-282
[10]   STARCH DETERMINATION IN HORTICULTURAL PLANT-MATERIAL BY AN ENZYMATIC-COLORIMETRIC PROCEDURE [J].
RASMUSSEN, TS ;
HENRY, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1990, 52 (02) :159-170