Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes

被引:148
作者
Cogliser, Claudia C. [1 ]
Schriesheim, Chester A. [2 ]
Scandura, Terri A.
Gardner, William L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Inst Leadership Res, Rawls Coll Business, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Management, Sch Business Adm, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
Leader-member exchange; Job performance; Organizational commitment; Job satisfaction; Inter-rater agreement; VERTICAL DYAD LINKAGE; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; OTHER RATING AGREEMENT; SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY; FEEDBACK-SEEKING; SELF; QUALITY; SUPERVISOR; CONTEXT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Using a sample of 285 matched pairs of employees and supervisors, we explore the extent to which congruence in leader and follower ratings of LMX quality is related to follower job performance and work attitudes. An original conceptual model is introduced that identifies four combinations of leader and follower LMX ratings: balanced/low LMX (low leader and follower LMX), balanced/high LMX (high leader and follower LMX), follower overestimation (low leader LMX/high follower LMX), and follower underestimation (high leader LMX/low follower LMX). As expected, balanced/low (high) LMX relationships were associated with relatively low (high) levels of follower job performance, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction, while the incongruent combinations generally yielded intermediate levels of follower outcomes. However, follower underestimation was also related to high levels of follower job performance, whereas follower overestimation was associated with high levels of follower satisfaction and organizational commitment. Implications of these findings for future LMX research are considered. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 465
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[81]  
Tabachnick, 2007, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V5th
[82]   Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization-employee agreement on contract obligations and violations [J].
Tekleab, AG ;
Taylor, MS .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 :585-608
[83]   Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? [J].
Tsui, AS ;
Pearce, JL ;
Porter, LW ;
Tripoli, AM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (05) :1089-1121
[84]   Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes [J].
Uhl-Bien, M ;
Maslyn, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (04) :511-532
[85]   Effects of LMX and differential treatment on work unit commitment [J].
van Breukelen, W ;
Konst, D ;
van der Vlist, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2002, 91 (01) :220-230
[87]  
Wang H, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P420, DOI 10.2307/20159668
[88]   INFLUENCE TACTICS, AFFECT, AND EXCHANGE QUALITY IN SUPERVISOR SUBORDINATE INTERACTIONS - A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT AND FIELD-STUDY [J].
WAYNE, SJ ;
FERRIS, GR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (05) :487-499
[89]  
Weiss D.J., 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, V22
[90]   The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science [J].
Westen, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (03) :333-371