On discourse and dirty nappies - gender, the division of household labour and the social psychology of distributive justice

被引:28
作者
Dixon, J [1 ]
Wetherell, M
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster LA1 4YF, England
[2] Open Univ, Fac Social Sci, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
关键词
discursive psychology; distributive justice; domestic labour; gender;
D O I
10.1177/0959354304042015
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article evaluates recent developments in research on the domestic division of labour. It focuses on the Distributive Justice Framework developed by Thompson (1991) in an extension of Major's (1987) work on the psychology of entitlement. This framework states that in order to explain the persistence of gender inequalities in domestic labour, researchers must consider the factors that determine women's sense of fairness in close relationships. Whilst acknowledging its contribution to the field, the article argues that existing work on the Distributive, Justice Framework has misconceived important aspects of the social psychology of distributive justice. By way of contrast, an approach is advanced that is grounded in the analysis of everyday discursive practices in the home-the practices through which couples define their contributions to household tabour and negotiate ideological dilemmas about gender, entitlement and fair shares. We argue that investigations of gender inequalities in domestic labour can benefit from the new directions provided by social constructionism, as well as the more complex views of subjectivity, power and social interaction that are now emerging in psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 189
页数:23
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]  
Harre R, 1995, DISCURSIVE PSYCHOL P
[32]   The orientation toward domestic labor questionnaire: Exploring dual-earner wives' sense of fairness about family work [J].
Hawkins, AJ ;
Marshall, CM ;
Allen, SM .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) :244-258
[33]   EXPLORING WIVES SENSE OF FAIRNESS ABOUT FAMILY WORK - AN INITIAL TEST OF THE DISTRIBUTIVE-JUSTICE FRAMEWORK [J].
HAWKINS, AJ ;
MARSHALL, CM ;
MEINERS, KM .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 1995, 16 (06) :693-721
[34]  
Hochschild A.R., 1989, The second shift
[35]   The effects of reasons given for ineligibility on perceived gender discrimination and feelings of injustice [J].
Kappen, DM ;
Branscombe, NR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :295-313
[36]   The division of labor across the transition to parenthood: A justice perspective [J].
Kluwer, ES ;
Heesink, JAM ;
van de Vliert, E .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2002, 64 (04) :930-943
[37]   Language and processes in the construction of equality in new marriages [J].
Knudson-Martin, C ;
Mahoney, AR .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 1998, 47 (01) :81-91
[38]   The everyday exploitation of women - Housework and the patriarchal mode of production [J].
Kynaston, C .
WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 1996, 19 (03) :221-237
[39]   RELATIVE FAIRNESS AND THE DIVISION OF HOUSEWORK - THE IMPORTANCE OF OPTIONS [J].
LENNON, MC ;
ROSENFIELD, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 100 (02) :506-531
[40]   FROM SOCIAL-INEQUALITY TO PERSONAL ENTITLEMENT - THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISONS, LEGITIMACY APPRAISALS, AND GROUP MEMBERSHIP [J].
MAJOR, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 26, 1994, 26 :293-355