Clinical Application of a Robotic Ankle Training Program for Cerebral Palsy Compared to the Research Laboratory Application: Does It Translate to Practice?

Objective: To determine the clinical efficacy of an ankle robotic rehabilitation protocol for patients with cerebral palsy. Design: The clinic cohort was identified from a retrospective chart review in a before-after intervention trial design and compared with a previously published prospective research cohort. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Children (N=28; mean age, 8.2 +/- 3.62y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, or ifi who were referred for ankle stretching and strengthening used a robotic ankle device in a clinic setting. Clinic results were compared with a previously published cohort of participants (N=12; mean age, 7.8 +/- 2.91y) seen in a research laboratory-based intervention protocol. Interventions: Patients in the clinic cohort were seen 2 times per week for 75-minute sessions for a total of 6 weeks. The first 30 minutes of the session were spent using the robotic ankle device for ankle stretching and strengthening, and the remaining 45 minutes were spent on functional movement activities. There was no control group. Main Outcome Measures: We compared pre- and postintervention measures of plantarflexor and dorsiflexor range of motion, strength, spasticity, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test, 10-m walk test), balance (Pediatric Balance Scale), Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE), and gross motor function measure (GMFM). Results: Significant improvements were found for the clinic cohort in all main outcome measures except for the GMFM. These improvements were equivalent to those reported in the research cohort, except for larger SCALE test changes in the research cohort. Conclusions: These findings suggest that translation of repetitive, goal-directed biofeedback training into the clinic setting is both feasible and beneficial for patients with cerebral palsy. (C) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine