Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments:: a comparative analysis

被引:162
作者
Talame, Valentina
Ozturk, Neslihan Z.
Bohnert, Hans J.
Tuberosa, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Agroenvironm Sci & Technol, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Biochem, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
barley; cDNA microarray; dehydration shock; drought stress; drought-responsive transcripts;
D O I
10.1093/jxb/erl163
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A microarray including 1654 cDNAs, mainly derived from dehydration-shocked barley leaf tissues, was utilized to monitor expression changes in leaves of barley plants subjected to slow drying conditions (7 d and 11 d: 7d-WS and 11d-WS) in soil and after rehydration. The results were compared with those obtained under shock-like conditions imposed with a 6 h dehydration treatment. A total number of 173 transcripts (similar to 10% of all transcripts profiled) were declared up- or down-regulated in at least one of the conditions tested. The majority of the transcripts were regulated by only one of the drought treatments, with 57% of the differentially expressed transcripts exclusively affected in the dehydration shock treatment, 6% at 7d-WS, 14% at 11d-WS, and 6% after rehydration. Irrespective of the low percentage of transcripts (10%) with similar expression changes between shock and slow stress treatments, a sizeable portion of these transcripts shared a common expression trend under the different drought treatment conditions, as evidenced by low but significant correlations between the fast occurring and the 7d-WS and 11d-WS treatments (r=0.32 and 0.41, P=0.001, respectively). These results are discussed with respect to the merit of different dehydration treatments in the investigation of the changes in transcript profiling.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 240
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Large scale analysis of transcripts abundance in barley subjected to several single and combined abiotic stress conditions [J].
Atienza, SG ;
Faccioli, P ;
Perrotta, G ;
Dalfino, G ;
Zschiesche, W ;
Humbeck, K ;
Stanca, AM ;
Cattivelli, L .
PLANT SCIENCE, 2004, 167 (06) :1359-1365
[2]   Transgenic approaches to increase dehydration-stress tolerance in plants [J].
Bajaj, S ;
Targolli, J ;
Liu, LF ;
Ho, THD ;
Wu, R .
MOLECULAR BREEDING, 1999, 5 (06) :493-503
[3]  
BLUM A, 2000, WEB SITE DEDICATED P
[4]  
Blum A, 1988, BREEDING STRESS ENV
[5]   ADAPTATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSES [J].
BOHNERT, HJ ;
NELSON, DE ;
JENSEN, RG .
PLANT CELL, 1995, 7 (07) :1099-1111
[6]   Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses [J].
Chen, WQ ;
Provart, NJ ;
Glazebrook, J ;
Katagiri, F ;
Chang, HS ;
Eulgem, T ;
Mauch, F ;
Luan, S ;
Zou, GZ ;
Whitham, SA ;
Budworth, PR ;
Tao, Y ;
Xie, ZY ;
Chen, X ;
Lam, S ;
Kreps, JA ;
Harper, JF ;
Si-Ammour, A ;
Mauch-Mani, B ;
Heinlein, M ;
Kobayashi, K ;
Hohn, T ;
Dangl, JL ;
Wang, X ;
Zhu, T .
PLANT CELL, 2002, 14 (03) :559-574
[7]   Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling [J].
Comai, L ;
Young, K ;
Till, BJ ;
Reynolds, SH ;
Greene, EA ;
Codomo, CA ;
Enns, LC ;
Johnson, JE ;
Burtner, C ;
Odden, AR ;
Henikoff, S .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2004, 37 (05) :778-786
[8]   PROLINE BIOSYNTHESIS AND OSMOREGULATION IN PLANTS [J].
DELAUNEY, AJ ;
VERMA, DPS .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1993, 4 (02) :215-223
[9]  
Deyholos MK, 2001, CYTOMETRY, V43, P229, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20010401)43:4<229::AID-CYTO1055>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-U