Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm

被引:218
作者
Evans, JST [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Dept Psychol, Ctr Thinking & Language, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.978
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The study of deductive reasoning has been a major paradigm in psychology for approximately the past 40 years. Research has shown that people make many logical errors on such tasks and are strongly influenced by problem content and context. It is argued that this paradigm was developed in a context of logicist thinking that is now outmoded. Few reasoning researchers still believe that logic is an appropriate normative system for most human reasoning, let alone a model for describing the process of human reasoning, and many use the paradigm principally to study pragmatic and probabilistic processes. It is suggested that the methods used for studying reasoning be reviewed, especially the instructional context, which necessarily defines pragmatic influences as biases.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 996
页数:19
相关论文
共 162 条
[71]  
Green DW, 2000, CAH PSYCHOL COGN, V19, P51
[72]  
GREEN DW, 1997, THINK REASONING, V3, P209
[73]   THE ELUSIVE THEMATIC-MATERIALS EFFECT IN WASON SELECTION TASK [J].
GRIGGS, RA ;
COX, JR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 73 (AUG) :407-420
[74]   THE EFFECTS OF PROBLEM CONTENT AND NEGATION ON WASON SELECTION TASK [J].
GRIGGS, RA ;
COX, JR .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 35 (AUG) :519-533
[75]  
GRIGGS RA, 1983, THINKING REASONING P, P16
[76]  
Handley SJ, 2000, DEDUCTIVE REASONING AND STRATEGIES, P241
[77]   ON THE RELATION BETWEEN LOGIC AND THINKING [J].
HENLE, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 69 (04) :366-378
[78]  
Hertwig R, 1997, CAH PSYCHOL COGN, V16, P102
[79]  
Holyoak K.J., 1995, THINK REASONING, V1, P289, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13546789508251504, 10.1080/13546789508251504]
[80]  
Inhelder B., 1958, The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence: An Essay on the Construction of Formal Operational Structures, V22