Enhancing the effectiveness of policy-relevant integrative research in rural areas

被引:11
作者
White, Piran C. L. [1 ]
Cinderby, Steve [2 ]
Raffaelli, Dave [1 ]
de Bruin, Annemarieke [3 ]
Holt, Alison [1 ]
Huby, Meg [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ York, Stockholm Environm Inst York, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ York, Dept Social Policy & Social Work, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
environmental; international; interdisciplinary; knowledge transfer; policy integration; scale; transdisciplinary; PUBLIC-POLICY; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; GEOGRAPHY; DISCIPLINARY; LANDSCAPES; RICHNESS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00871.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
There has been much debate about the importance of policy-relevant research in geography over the last decade. There has also been an increasing recognition by policymakers of the importance of integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) approaches to policy-relevant research. However, geographers have been more reluctant than their colleagues in other social and natural sciences to embrace integrative research collaborations. For integrative research to achieve its full potential and to encourage greater participation from the geographical research community, we need to increase our understanding of its potential value, but also some of the challenges that it poses, and how these can be overcome. In this paper, we consider the processes involved in conducting successful integrative research from the perspective of researchers involved in these projects. We base our analysis on the results of a questionnaire survey of international integrative research programmes on environmental issues in rural areas, combined with our own experiences of working in integrative research. We conclude that effective integrative research depends on the establishment of a clear conceptual framework, the use of appropriate temporal and spatial scales in the research, effective language and communication, time and commitment, and trust and respect. We also highlight the value of stakeholder involvement in integrative research to ensure the policy relevance of the work and provide a mechanism to assist with effective knowledge transfer of the results.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 424
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Massey D, 2000, T I BRIT GEOGR, V25, P131
  • [22] Geography, policy and politics: a response to Dorling and Shaw
    Massey, D
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (05) : 645 - 646
  • [23] Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom?
    Merenlender, AM
    Huntsinger, L
    Guthey, G
    Fairfax, SK
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [24] TRANSFORMING THE SPATIAL BASIS OF AGRICULTURAL CENSUS COVER DATA
    MOXEY, A
    MCCLEAN, C
    ALLANSON, P
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [25] COORDINATING DISCIPLINARY AND ORGANIZATIONAL WAYS OF KNOWING
    NORGAARD, RB
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 42 (1-2) : 205 - 216
  • [26] *ODPM, 2004, ENGL IND DEPR 2004
  • [27] Social geography: seven deadly myths in policy research
    Pain, R
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (02) : 250 - 259
  • [28] Unhealthy landscapes: Policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence
    Patz, JA
    Daszak, P
    Tabor, GM
    Aguirre, AA
    Pearl, M
    Epstein, J
    Wolfe, ND
    Kilpatrick, AM
    Foufopoulos, J
    Molyneux, D
    Bradley, DJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (10) : 1092 - 1098
  • [29] Managing the koala problem: Interdisciplinary perspectives
    Stratford, E
    Mazur, N
    Lunney, D
    Bennett, D
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) : 610 - 618
  • [30] Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice
    Tress, B
    Tress, G
    Fry, G
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2005, 70 (1-2) : 177 - 191