Does Zero Tillage Improve the Livelihoods of Smallholder Cropping Farmers?

被引:43
作者
El-Shater, Tamer [1 ]
Yigezu, Yigezu A. [1 ]
Mugera, Amin [2 ]
Piggin, Colin [1 ]
Haddad, Atef [1 ]
Khalil, Yaseen [1 ]
Loss, Stephen [1 ]
Aw-Hassan, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Western Australia, Inst Agr, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Consumption; cropping farms; endogenous switching regression; farm income; livelihoods; propensity score matching; small holders; Syria; zero tillage; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; ECONOMETRIC EVALUATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; ADOPTION; VARIETIES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/1477-9552.12133
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The biophysical benefits of zero tillage (ZT) are well documented in the literature. However, the literature on its economic benefits, especially in the context of small and medium-scale farmers in the temperate developing world is scanty. Using a study of 621 wheat farmers in Syria, we provide empirical evidence on the impacts of adoption of ZT on farm income and wheat consumption. We use propensity score matching (PSM) and endogenous switching regression (ESR) approaches to account for potential selection biases. After controlling for confounding factors, we find that adoption of the ZT technology leads to a US$ 189/ha (33%) increase in net crop income and a 26kg (34%) gain in per capita wheat consumption per year (adult equivalent) - an indication of meaningful changes in the livelihoods of the farm households. Besides the biophysical and environmental benefits documented elsewhere, our results suggest that adoption of ZT can also be justified on economic and food security grounds. Therefore, ZT can have sizeable impacts in transforming the agricultural sector in the temperate developing world provided that the technology is well promoted and adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 172
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature [J].
Baumgart-Getz, Adam ;
Prokopy, Linda Stalker ;
Floress, Kristin .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 96 (01) :17-25
[2]  
Belloum A, 2007, CONSERVATION AGR SUS
[3]   Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching [J].
Caliendo, Marco ;
Kopeinig, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2008, 22 (01) :31-72
[4]   Per capita versus adult-equivalent estimates of calorie availability in household budget surveys [J].
Claro, Rafael Moreira ;
Levy, Renata Bertazzi ;
Bandoni, Daniel Henrique ;
Mondini, Lenise .
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2010, 26 (11) :2188-2195
[5]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[6]   Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions [J].
D'Emden, Francis H. ;
Llewellyn, Rick S. ;
Burton, Michael P. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 52 (02) :169-182
[7]   Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (01) :151-161
[8]   Does Adaptation to Climate Change Provide Food Security? A Micro-Perspective from Ethiopia [J].
Di Falco, Salvatore ;
Veronesi, Marcella ;
Yesuf, Mahmud .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (03) :825-842
[9]  
Fraser H, 2010, PALGRAVE STUD NINET-, pIX
[10]  
Friedrich T., 2012, Field Actions Science Reports, DOI DOI 10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927