An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration

被引:106
作者
Bian, Xuemei [1 ]
Moutinho, Luiz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Business, Kingston Upon Hull HU16 5RD, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Dept Management, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Counterfeit; Brand image; Brand personality; Consideration set; Product involvement; Product knowledge; PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT; BRAND PERSONALITY; PERCEIVED RISK; CONSUMERS; IMPACT; MODEL; SELF; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The primary purpose of this study is to examine the determinants governing the likelihood of considering the purchase of counterfeit branded products (CBPs) in the context of non-deceptive counterfeiting. The study anticipates and explores the effects of consumer-perceived brand image (i.e., brand personality, product attributes, and benefits/consequences), perceived risk, product knowledge, product involvement, and consumer demographic variables. Focus groups generated the criteria that consumers use to evaluate the studied brands; the main study then collected data from interviews. The results show that among the tested variables, brand personality performs best in determining consideration of the CBR In general, demographic variables and product involvement do not appear to be significantly influential. The results also provide empirical evidence for Plummer's (Plummer, J.T. How Personality Makes a Difference. journal of Advertising Research 1985; 24 (6): 27-83 (December/January), Plummer, J.T. How Personality Makes a Difference. journal of Advertising Research 2000; 40 (6): 79-83 (November/December)) notion of brand image components; furthermore the results also suggest that perceived risks should not be part of the benefit/consequence component of the brand image concept. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 378
页数:11
相关论文
共 128 条
[51]  
Dodge HR, 1996, PSYCHOL MARKET, V13, P821, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199612)13:8<821::AID-MAR7>3.0.CO
[52]  
2-H
[53]   CONGRUENCE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SELF IMAGES AND PRODUCT BRANDS [J].
DOLICH, IJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1969, 6 (01) :80-84
[54]  
Dubois B., 1995, J ADVERTISING RES, P69
[55]  
Eisend M., 2006, Academy of Marketing Science Review, V12, P1
[56]  
Ewing M., 1999, Journal of Product and Brand Management, V8, P38, DOI DOI 10.1108/10610429910257977
[58]  
Fill C., 1999, MARKETING COMMUNICAT, V2
[59]  
Fishbein M.A., 1967, READINGS ATTITUDE TH, P477
[60]  
FREEDMAN H, 1999, FORBES, V163, P48