Increased remission rates with venlafaxine compared with fluoxetine in hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia

被引:75
作者
Tzanakaki, M
Guazzelli, M
Nimatoudis, I
Zissis, NP
机构
[1] Wyeth Hellas, Dept Clin Res, Athens 16452, Greece
[2] Psychiat Hosp Souda, Hania, Crete, Greece
[3] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hosp, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
fluoxetine; major depression; paroxetine; remission;
D O I
10.1097/00004850-200015010-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This was a 6-week, double-blind, randomized trial of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in 109 patients with major depression and melancholia. Hospitalized and day care patients with DSM-IV major depression and melancholia and a baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of greater than or equal to 25 were eligible. The doses were venlafaxine 75 mg/day or fluoxetine 20 mg/day from days 1-4, venlafaxine 150 mg/day or fluoxetine 40 mg/day from days 5-10, and venlafaxine 225 mg/day or fluoxetine 60 mg/day from days 11-42. The intention-to-treat analyses included 55 patients on venlafaxine and 54 on fluoxetine. At the final evaluation, 70% of patients with venlafaxine and 66% with fluoxetine had greater than or equal to 50% reduction in the MADRS score, and 70% with venlafaxine and 62% with fluoxetine had a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score of 1 or 2. A CGI improvement score of 1 was observed in 51% of patients with venlafaxine and 32% with fluoxetine (P = 0.018). A final Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score < 7 was attained in 41% of venlafaxine-treated and 36% of fluoxetine-treated patients. Overall, 22% of patients in each group discontinued therapy, but only 5% on venlafaxine and 9% on fluoxetine discontinued for adverse events. Nausea was reported in 5.5% of venlafaxine-treated patients and 14.8% of fluoxetine-treated patients. Venlafaxine was effective and well tolerated for treating inpatients with major depression and melancholia. Based on remission criteria (HAM-D < 7 or CGI of 1), venlafaxine was superior to fluoxetine. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, PRIMARY CARE PSYCHIA
  • [2] A 12-WEEK DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER STUDY OF PAROXETINE AND IMIPRAMINE IN HOSPITALIZED DEPRESSED-PATIENTS
    ARMINEN, SL
    IKONEN, U
    PULKKINEN, P
    LEINONEN, E
    MAHLANEN, A
    KOPONEN, H
    KOURULA, K
    RYYPPO, J
    KORPELA, V
    LEHTONEN, ML
    VARTIAINEN, H
    LEHTINEN, V
    TAMMINEN, T
    MANNICHE, PM
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 89 (06) : 382 - 389
  • [3] Beasley C M Jr, 1993, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V5, P199, DOI 10.3109/10401239309148983
  • [4] A randomized, double-blind comparison of a rapidly escalating dose of venlafaxine and imipramine in inpatients with major depression and melancholia
    Benkert, O
    Grunder, G
    Wetzel, H
    Hackett, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1996, 30 (06) : 441 - 451
  • [5] The influence of cognitive variables on recovery in depressed inpatients
    Bothwell, R
    Scott, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1997, 43 (03) : 207 - 212
  • [6] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF VENLAFAXINE AND FLUOXETINE IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED FOR MAJOR DEPRESSION AND MELANCHOLIA
    CLERC, GE
    RUIMY, P
    VERDEAUPAILLES, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 9 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [7] A double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine for treatment of major depression in outpatients
    Dierick, M
    Ravizza, L
    Realini, R
    Martin, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 20 (01) : 57 - 71
  • [8] FARAVELLI C, 1986, AM J PSYCHIAT, V143, P888
  • [9] GUELFI JD, 1995, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V56, P450
  • [10] Guy W., 1976, Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, DHEW Publ No ADM 76-338, pp 218-222., P218