Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation

被引:265
作者
Margules, CR [1 ]
Pressey, RL
Williams, PH
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Trop Forest Res Ctr, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia
[2] Rainforest Cooperat Res Ctr, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia
[3] NSW Natl Pk & Wildlife Serv, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
[4] Nat Hist Museum, Dept Entomol, London SW7 5BD, England
关键词
biodiversity priority areas; biodiversity surrogates; complementarity; representativeness;
D O I
10.1007/BF02704962
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Biodiversity priority areas together should represent the biodiversity of the region they are situated in. To achieve this, biodiversity has to be measured, biodiversity goals have to be set and methods for implementing those goals have to be applied. Each of these steps is discussed. Because it is impossible to measure all of biodiversity, biodiversity surrogates have to be used. Examples are taxa sub-sets, species assemblages and environmental domains. Each of these has different strengths and weaknesses, which are described and evaluated. In real-world priority setting, some combination of these is usually employed. While a desirable goal might be to sample all of biodiversity from genotypes to ecosystems, an achievable goal is to represent, at some agreed level, each of the biodiversity features chosen as surrogates. Explicit systematic procedures for implementing such a goal are described. These procedures use complementarity, a measure of the contribution each area in a region makes to the conservation goal, to estimate irreplaceability and flexibility, measures of the extent to which areas can be substituted for one another in order to take competing land uses into account. Persistence and vulnerability, which also play an important role in the priority setting process, are discussed briefly.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 326
页数:18
相关论文
共 168 条
[91]   BIOLOGICAL MODELS FOR MONITORING SPECIES DECLINE - CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF DATA-BASES [J].
MARGULES, CR ;
AUSTIN, MP ;
MOLLISON, D ;
SMITH, F .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 344 (1307) :69-75
[92]   SELECTING REPRESENTATIVE RESERVE SYSTEMS IN REMOTE AREAS - A CASE-STUDY IN THE NULLARBOR REGION, AUSTRALIA [J].
MCKENZIE, NL ;
BELBIN, L ;
MARGULES, CR ;
KEIGHERY, GJ .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1989, 50 (1-4) :239-261
[93]   Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views [J].
McKinney, ML .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 :495-516
[94]  
Miller K., 1996, BALANCING SCALES GUI
[95]   Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: Approaches to setting conservation priorities [J].
Mittermeier, RA ;
Myers, N ;
Thomsen, JB ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Olivieri, S .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) :516-520
[96]  
MOORE N, 1987, BIRD TIME SCI POLITI
[97]   Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities [J].
Myers, N ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Mittermeier, CG ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Kent, J .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6772) :853-858
[98]  
Nelson G., 1985, Cladistics, V1, P386, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00435.x
[99]   AN UPGRADED RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHM [J].
NICHOLLS, AO ;
MARGULES, CR .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1993, 64 (02) :165-169
[100]   HOW TO MAKE BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS GO FURTHER WITH GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS [J].
NICHOLLS, AO .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1989, 50 (1-4) :51-75