Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer

被引:162
作者
Ben-Josef, E
Shields, AF
Vaishampayan, U
Vaitkevicius, V
El-Rayes, BF
McDermott, P
Burmeister, J
Bossenberger, T
Philip, PA
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Div Hematol Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词
IMRT; capecitabine; pancreatic cancer; radiosensitization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Local failure continues to be a major problem in the management of pancreatic cancer. Delivery of adequate radiation doses to the pancreas is limited by radiation-sensitive normal structures in the upper abdomen. To overcome some of these restrictions, we have developed a regimen of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent capecitabine. Methods and Material: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated on this regimen (7 as adjuvant therapy after curative resection and 8 patients for unresectable disease). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was planned using the CORVUS system and delivered with a segmented multileaf collimator, using a 6-MV photon beam and 10 intensity steps. Two target volumes were entered: target 1 consisted of the gross tumor volume (in unresectable cases) or the tumor bed (in postsurgical cases); and target 2 consisted of the draining lymph nodes. Both targets were treated simultaneously in 25 daily fractions, 5 days a week. In the postoperative setting, the total dose to target 1 was 45-54 Gy (median, 54 Gy). For unresectable disease the dose was 54-55 Gy (median, 54 Gy). The total dose to target 2 was 45 Gy in all patients. Patients were treated with one of two six-field beam arrangements found to produce superior dose distributions. Capecitabine was given at 1,600 mg/m(2)/day in two divided doses, 5 days per week, concurrently with radiotherapy. In addition, most patients (73%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Systemic chemotherapy was given before, after, or both before and after chemoradiotherapy in 47%, 7%, and 20% of patients, respectively. Patients were evaluated on a weekly basis. Results: Treatment was tolerated well. Grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting developed in 8 patients (53%) and Grade 1/2 hematologic toxicity developed in 9 patients (60%). Only 1 patient (7%) had Grade 3 toxicity, a gastric ulceration that responded to medical management. Nine patients (60%) had weight loss (median, 7 lbs; range, 3-12 lbs). The median follow-up time is 8.5 months (10.1 months in patients who are alive). In the resectable group there have been no deaths, and there has been 1 local relapse (14%). In the unresectable group there have been 2 deaths, and the 1-year actuarial survival rate is 69%. Two patients converted to resectability, 5 patients (62.5%) have persistent locoregional disease after chemoradiotherapy, and 1 patient (12%) is locally controlled without surgery. Conclusions: This regimen of IMRT with tumor-selective radiosensitization is well tolerated. The low toxicity profile compares favorably with that of protocols based on continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine, and the preliminary indications of efficacy are encouraging. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 459
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] 2-5
  • [12] NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS
    KAPLAN, EL
    MEIER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) : 457 - 481
  • [13] Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Kim, JS
    Kim, JS
    Cho, MJ
    Song, KS
    Yoon, WH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02): : 403 - 408
  • [14] Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region - Phase III trial of the EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group
    Klinkenbijl, JH
    Jeekel, J
    Sahmoud, T
    van Pel, R
    Couvreur, ML
    Veenhof, CH
    Arnaud, JP
    Gonzalez, DG
    de Wit, LT
    Hennipman, A
    Wils, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (06) : 776 - 782
  • [15] Landry Jerome C, 2002, Med Dosim, V27, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00094-8
  • [16] Phase I trial of radiation dose escalation with concurrent weekly full-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    McGinn, CJ
    Zalupski, MM
    Shureiqi, I
    Robertson, JM
    Eckhauser, FE
    Smith, DC
    Brown, D
    Hejna, G
    Strawderman, M
    Normolle, D
    Lawrence, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (22) : 4202 - 4208
  • [17] Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue
    Miwa, M
    Ura, M
    Nishida, M
    Sawada, N
    Ishikawa, T
    Mori, K
    Shimma, N
    Umeda, I
    Ishitsuka, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (08) : 1274 - 1281
  • [18] Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer:: a randomised controlled trial
    Neoptolemos, JP
    Dunn, JA
    Stocken, DD
    Almond, J
    Link, K
    Beger, H
    Bassi, C
    Falconi, M
    Pederzoli, P
    Dervenis, C
    Fernandez-Cruz, L
    Lacaine, F
    Pap, A
    Spooner, D
    Kerr, DJ
    Friess, H
    Büchler, MW
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 358 (9293) : 1576 - 1585
  • [19] LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER RESECTION FOR DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS - IS IT REALLY IMPROVING
    NITECKI, SS
    SARR, MG
    COLBY, TV
    VANHEERDEN, JA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [20] IMPROVING ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR RECTAL-CANCER BY COMBINING PROTRACTED-INFUSION FLUOROURACIL WITH RADIATION-THERAPY AFTER CURATIVE SURGERY
    OCONNELL, M
    MARTENSON, JA
    WIEAND, HS
    KROOK, JE
    MACDONALD, JS
    HALLER, DG
    MAYER, RJ
    GUNDERSON, LL
    RICH, TA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (08) : 502 - 507