Imaging of anorectal disease

被引:60
作者
Stoker, J
Rociu, E
Wiersma, TG
Laméris, JS
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Rijnstate Hosp, Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01338.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Over the past two decades developments in imaging have changed the assessment of patients with anorectal disease. Methods: The literature on imaging techniques for anorectal diseases was reviewed over the period 1980-1999. Results: For the staging of primary rectal tumours, phased array magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be regarded as the most appropriate single technique. The combination of endosonography or endoluminal MRI with ultrasonography or spiral computed tomography yields similar results. All techniques have limitations both for local staging and in the assessment of distant metastases. MRI or positron emission tomography is preferable for tumour recurrence. For perianal fistula, high-resolution MRI (phased array or endoluminal) is the technique of choice. For constipation, defaecography is the preferred technique, nowadays with emphasis on functional information. The role of magnetic resonance defaecography is currently being evaluated. For faecal incontinence, endosonography and endoluminal MRI give similar results in detecting sphincter defects; endoluminal MRI has the advantage of detecting external sphincter atrophy. Conclusion: High-resolution MRI, endosonography and defaecography are currently the optimal imaging techniques for anorectal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 27
页数:18
相关论文
共 199 条
[1]   Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: Correlation with histopathologic and CT findings [J].
Abdel-Nabi, H ;
Doerr, RJ ;
Lamonica, DM ;
Cronin, VR ;
Galantowicz, P ;
Carbone, GM ;
Spaulding, MB .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) :755-760
[2]   Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer [J].
Akasu, T ;
Sugihara, K ;
Moriya, Y ;
Fujita, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (10) :S10-S15
[3]   Fecal incontinence: Transvaginal US evaluation of anatomic causes [J].
Alexander, AA ;
Liu, JB ;
Merton, DA ;
Nagle, DA .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) :529-532
[4]   4-CONTRAST DEFECOGRAPHY - PELVIC FLOOR-OSCOPY [J].
ALTRINGER, WE ;
SACLARIDES, TJ ;
DOMINGUEZ, JM ;
BRUBAKER, LT ;
SMITH, CS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (07) :695-699
[5]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF FISTULA-IN-ANO - TECHNIQUE, INTERPRETATION AND ACCURACY [J].
BARKER, PG ;
LUNNISS, PJ ;
ARMSTRONG, P ;
REZNEK, RH ;
COTTAM, K ;
PHILLIPS, RK .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (01) :7-13
[6]   EVACUATION PROCTOGRAPHY - AN INVESTIGATION OF RECTAL EXPULSION IN 20 SUBJECTS WITHOUT DEFECATORY DISTURBANCE [J].
BARTRAM, CI ;
TURNBULL, GK ;
LENNARDJONES, JE .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 13 (01) :72-80
[7]   Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano [J].
Beckingham, IJ ;
Spencer, JA ;
Ward, J ;
Dyke, GW ;
Adams, C ;
Ambrose, NS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (10) :1396-1398
[8]  
BEETSTAN RGH, 1999, EUR RADIOL, V9, pS257
[9]   Lymph node metastases: Safety and effectiveness of MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles - Initial clinical experience [J].
Bellin, MF ;
Roy, C ;
Kinkel, K ;
Thoumas, D ;
Zaim, S ;
Vanel, D ;
Tuchmann, C ;
Richard, F ;
Jacqmin, D ;
Delcourt, A ;
Challier, E ;
Lebret, T ;
Cluzel, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :799-808
[10]   PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MESORECTAL LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN RECTAL-CANCER [J].
BEYNON, J ;
MORTENSEN, NJM ;
FOY, DMA ;
CHANNER, JL ;
RIGBY, H ;
VIRJEE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (03) :276-279