Experiments and modeling of the hydraulic resistance of in-line square pin fin heat sinks with top by-pass flow

被引:5
作者
Dogruoz, MB [1 ]
Urdaneta, M [1 ]
Ortega, A [1 ]
Westphal, RV [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
ITHERM 2002: EIGHTH INTERSOCIETY CONFERENCE ON THERMAL AND THERMOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA IN ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS | 2002年
关键词
in-line; pin fins; heat sink; by-pass; two-branch model; hydraulic resistance;
D O I
10.1109/ITHERM.2002.1012465
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In pin-fin heat sinks, the flow within the core exhibits separation and hence does not lend itself to simple analytical boundary layer or duct flow analysis of the wall friction. Indeed, form or bluff-body drag may be even more important than viscous wall friction in establishing the overall pressure drop. In this paper, we present some early findings from an experimental and analytical study aimed at obtaining physical insight into the behavior of square, in-line pin fin heat sinks. In the experimental study, various size aluminum heat sinks were utilized, where the pin heights were 12.5 mm, 17.5 mm, and 22.5 mm, and the base dimensions were kept fixed at 25 x 25 nun. A "two-branch by-pass model" was developed, in which a one-dimensional differential approach was used to model the fluid flow through the heat sink and its top by-pass duct. Central to the analysis is the introduction of accurate correlations for inlets exit and core pressure drop within the heat sink. Pressure drop predictions correlated well with the experimental data when pressure drop coefficients measured for the heat sinks were used. Agreement was poorer when classical circular tube bundle pressure drop correlations were utilized, but the accuracy was high enough for design purposes. Inlet and exit pressure losses were as important as the core pressure drop in establishing the overall flow and pressure drop. Available literature models for inlet and exit effects were mostly adequate.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
BIBER CR, 1997, P INTERPACK97
[2]
Butterbaugh M. A., 1995, Advances in Electronic Packaging 1995. Proceedings of the International Electronic Packaging Conference - INTERpack '95, P843
[3]
Thermofluid analysis of staggered and inline pin fin heat sinks [J].
Dvinsky, A ;
Bar-Cohen, A ;
Strelets, M .
ITHERM 2000: SEVENTH INTERSOCIETY CONFERENCE ON THERMAL AND THERMOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA IN ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :157-164
[4]
Idelchik I, 1989, FLOW RESISTANCE DESI
[5]
Modeling of the thermal and hydraulic performance of plate fin, strip fin, and pin fin heat sinks - Influence of flow bypass [J].
Jonsson, H ;
Moshfegh, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS AND PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, 24 (02) :142-149
[6]
JONSSON H, 2001, P IPACK 2001
[7]
Kays WM, 1998, COMPACT HEAT EXCHANG, V3rd
[8]
KNIGHT RW, 1991, J ELECTRON PACKAGING, V113, P313, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.2905412]
[9]
LEE S, 1995, P IEEE SEMICOND THER, P48, DOI 10.1109/STHERM.1995.512051
[10]
Design and optimization of pin fin heat sinks for low velocity applications [J].
Shaukatullah, H ;
Storr, WR ;
Hansen, BJ ;
Gaynes, MA .
TWELFTH ANNUAL IEEE SEMICONDUCTOR THERMAL MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :151-163